Will The Real Atlantis Please Stand Up?

A year ago if you typed ‘Atlantis dig’ into Google Image search, you would get pictures of structures on the ocean floor.



Now when you type it in, you get the same pictures but with glass and looking like an exhibition..

This is supposedly the Dig Observatory at Atlantis [Bahamas Paradise Island]



If someone can find video of this exhibit inside the Bahamas attraction, link me. I didn’t see it in any of the tourist videos I watched. You’ll notice that the facade surrounding the aquariums doesn't look anything like the one above (CGI?).

Electric Souls

It's interesting to note that the camera can discern between an electric soul and a natural one. I will provide a video clip here showing an interview with the YouTube CEO, Susan Wojcicki,, who is taking down channels of those in the truth community while promoting the trending of music artists (for lack of a better term) who can only be described as corruption.

For example... 
6ix9ine's 'Stoopid' video
[31 million views]

"Bitch I'm stupid, bitch I'm dumb
I be tweakin', I be wildin', I be booted (Bitch I be drunk)
I be stealin', I be robbin', I be lootin' (You don't wanna die)
Your boyfriend dumb, he get no money, bitch, he stupid
Oh, bitch, he, oh, bitch, he stupid
Damn, homie, in high school you was the man, homie (2012)
What the fuck happened to you? (Stoopid)
I'm just sayin', homie
Now you smokin' Black & Milds, smokin' reds, homie
Ah, ah, ah, what's up? Shmurda on the motherfucker
He said nigga 6ix9ine was poppin, cuz
Tell him shut up, suck a dick..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDa5iGiPgGs

Cue the following video to 10:23 and notice Susan Wojcicki's head will pixelate but the interviewer's head remains normal..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klQZLssoyl4

"You and me, we are electric soldiers
With the power of lightning in our eyes
Don't believe a single world they told ya
When they said that we would never last, 
We'll always survive..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7i0cYlIqmY

What Are Causes?

Smarty Pants: "Well you might of course again consult the dictionary, but I suppose you’re looking for a substantive answer here, which would in all truth be: “We know shit about them, maybe they doesn’t even exist”. In physical terminology, a cause is simply that set of circumstances that necessitate some result.The essence of determinism is quite simply that at all times the state of a system is fully determined but it’s state history. In such a system there can be no choice at all. So, in physics a cause is simply the history of states, since that uniquely determines the next state. We know of no example of non-determinism ever. It appears that our universe is indeed deterministic."

Me: No, not what are causes but what are THE causes of the determined? I’m only going by the dictionary definition which you directed me to. That definition included causes but you haven’t stated what they were.

Smarty Pants: "The dictionary does not specify that there is such a thing as THE causes, it speaks of all events having causes. Each event might have, by that definition different causes. As to what these causes might be, that depends on your conception of causes. I gave you the one from physics. The one from philosophy would be different somewhat. From a physics standpoint these causes are simply the history of states. So I actually did state what they were. Of course you might now like to dig deeper and ask what a state is, or what an event is ;-)"

Me: “From a physics standpoint these causes are simply the history of states.”

There is no history in a determined reality."

Smarty Pants: “There is no history in a determined reality.”

"A nice mix of words, but what do they mean? What is ‘a determined reality’? And why would it not have a history? Which claim are you even making here?"

Me: “History is history only if there is an observer in a relative event frame. Outside of reference frames all determined events exist ‘now’."

Smarty Pants: “History is history only if there is an observer in a relative event frame. ”

An interesting claim. History is simply history. A partial order of events. It needs no observers at all. What constitutes an observer. Is an earth worm an observer? What do you mean by ‘a relative event frame’.

“Outside of reference frames all determined events exist ‘now’.”

An even more interesting claim. Everything exists in its own reference frame, so everything has a history!"

Me: “There has to be an observer in one specific reference frame. The events don’t need an observer to exist, correct? An observer is a body with a brain and sensory organs and an infrastructure that can bring information from the senses to the brain to be processed.

“What do you mean by ‘a relative event frame’?”

The events of yesterday are future events if seen from events two days ago."

Smarty Pants: “There has to be an observer in one specific reference frame”

Why? What ‘specific’ reference frame?

“An observer is a body with a brain and sensory organs and an infrastructure that can bring information from the senses to the brain to be processed.”

No, an observer is anything that can interact. A camera is an observer. No mind, no brain, no body. Just matter. An atom is an observer! Physically, to observe a thing is to interact with that thing. Any physical thing is an observer. No consciousness needed at all."

Me: “Why? What ‘specific’ reference frame?”

Every moment is a reference frame. Every time objects in that moment have shifted to new locations, that will be a new moment (reference frame).Cameras aren’t observing anything. YOU can observe through a camera and YOU can observe the photos taken by the camera. The camera can’t see anything (it’s an object)."

Smarty Pants: “Every moment is a reference frame. Every time objects in that moment have shifted to new locations, that will be a new moment (reference frame).”
Well, no, a reference frame is quite arbitrary and, you can keep it fixed. But even under your (exceedingly strange) usage, these ‘reference frames’ then are the history.
“Cameras aren’t observing anything. ”
They most certainly are. Basic physics 101. The camera sees exactly like you see. Perhaps you are not talking about seeing, but perceiving. Sight is a physical process, perception a cognitive one.

Me: “Sight is a physical process, perception a cognitive one.”
I see. If I say, ‘pink elephant’, do you see a pink elephant in your mind?

sec·ond sight

noun

the supposed ability to perceive future or distant events; clairvoyance.

Linear time is perceptually-dependent. If cameras can’t perceive, they cannot witness the passage of time."

Smarty Pants: “sec·ond sight"
Cute, but as far as is known purely fictional. Relevance?
“Linear time is perceptually-dependent. If cameras can’t perceive, they cannot witness the passage of time.”
Who says time is linear? Perceptually-dependent? Don’t confuse a thing with any perception of that thing. Camera’s witness the passing of time as any other thing does, including you. Using the word ‘witness’ does not change anything here. Do note that we are drifting ever further away from the original topic!

Me: “Cute, but as far as is known purely fictional. Relevance?”
The definition calls ‘sight’ a ‘perception’. You made a false dichotomy.
“Who says time is linear?’
Are you saying it isn’t? Explain.
“Don’t confuse a thing with any perception of that thing.”
Linear time isn’t a thing. It’s a perception conditioned on observing from a specific reference frame. Events are things but events aren’t time. The reason you can’t grab a woman’s ass without her say-so is because that would be ‘objectifying’ her. She’s not an object. She’s a witness (unlike objects such as cameras) of your behavior towards what she owns (her object/body).

Programmed For Sex

A conversation with…

John Gould, Studied at Technical University Eindhoven



The question was asked..

If the universe follows causality, how can there be free will?

I challenged Viktor T. Toth..

Victor: “Does this machine have free will, in your opinion? Because if you say it doesn’t, I have to ask: What exactly does it take for an entity to have free will? Is it the lack of deterministic behavior?”

Me: “Humans have non-programmed desire and the will (and often the means) to fulfill them. Machines are doing what they’ve been programmed to do, whether they be sophisticated programs or pocket-calculator-simple.”

John: “Humans have non-programmed desire”
I could agree with “Humans have desire”. How do we know about this unprogrammed part you added?

Me: “I suppose we don’t. There’s evidence that desire for sex is a program which is the lack of logical rationale for being aroused by particular body shapes/parts. That being said, the desire for pleasantness can only make sense if there is an experiencer (subject rather than object) that can benefit from pleasantness.

John: “That being said, the desire for pleasantness can only make sense if there is an experiencer (subject rather than object) that can benefit from pleasantness.” I can agree with that, but from that does not follow any lack of programming. For all I know, subjects might well be emergent from objects! (And of course, for all I know, it might not be). Or more simply put, the fact that I feel and experience does not entail that this feeling and experiencing is not itself ‘programmed’, a consequence of our structure if you will.

Me: “Programming is done for a purpose. Who is the programmer?”

John: “That’s mere wordplay Stephane. You chose the phrase programming, which suggests a programmer. I’d have used the word deterministic, which does not imply a determiner. There need be no who, nor even a what!”

Me: ““I’d have used the word deterministic, which does not imply a determiner.” Can you support that claim?

John: “The semantics of words is defined by a dictionary. Deviation from that semantics is of course allowed, but must be explicitly noted. So, what does that dictionary tell you?”

Me: “de·ter·min·is·tic
dəˌtərməˈnistik/
adjective

1. relating to the philosophical doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes regarded as external to the will.
   
   
   
   There’s mention of ‘causes’.
   
   What are the causes?

Unseen Zones

This Song Serves As A Warning...

What lives in the unseen zones not seen in between

Those without flesh or bone?

Roam in the void they avoid all detection

Inner dimensional beings all connected

Angels and demons from spiritual realms

Engaged in battle from Heaven and Hell

They dwell all around us and even inside 

Some of those that invite what they call spirit guides

Enticed by ouija boards they seek guidance

And think there's a secret to be enlightened

Little do they know what they've just invited

A demonic presence has just resided

In the days of Noah all kinds of hybrids

Infiltrated the earth but most were silenced

Wiped out by the flood all these tyrants

Bloodlines polluted by these ancient giants

The men of renown heroes of old

Have now returned let the the truth be told

They wear new disguises Thoth and Isis

Are now aliens to invite us and guide us

Their fruit is ripened it's so inviting

Evolve to a god enlightened

And don't be frightened but I must ask why

Their ideas seem aligned with Lucifer's lie?

This song serves a warning to anyone searching

Demonic minions are lurking

They're virtually everywhere posing as anything

Stocking their prey with original sin

Is it coincidence that all these incidents

Represent all the same things the serpent said?

Look at Genesis chapter three verse six

It depicts exactly the same conflict

The oldest trick inflicted by the sick and wicked

Invented presented like a light transcended

But it's dark demented and it just pretended

Depending on beliefs what you just expected

See how a rose has a thorns and thistles

They hide among truth to avoid a signal

They muddy the water with disinformation

Persuading so many without a foundation

Some people listen to Icke and Sitchin

Jordan Maxwell and Tsarion

It seems like these people have the same mission

Deny what is Christian seek secret wisdom

Tied into the lies of the moving Zeitgeist

Lost they deny the existence of Christ

I defy you to find any truth to their logic

Go ahead just rewind and pause it

Study their sources they're all masonic

Elite illuminati get behind it

They know the public will buy any fraud

That tries to deny the existence of God..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOCaYEV3jDc

Stop Pulling My Leg

A question was posed:
“If the Sun's gravity is constantly pulling planets toward it, why hasn't the Earth been pulled into the Sun?”


Michael Milligan: Data Modeler 2011-present, Studied Biology at Buffalo State College Graduated 1980
“It has been, and still is”

Sriraj S: Studied at Andhra University College of Sciences
“The Earth is always being pulled towards the Sun by gravity”

Michael Wilson
“Actually, orbiting IS falling into the Sun”

Allen E Hall: +25 years in Aerospace Management, Manufacturing, Engineering and IT
“The Earth is slowly drifting away from the sun”

Mark Adler: Physicist, Mathematician, Electrical Engineer, Rocket Scientist, Computer Programmer
“The planets are in fact constantly accelerating towards the Sun”
_________________________________________________________________

Let’s get this straight...

The earth is pulling at the sun, and the sun is pulling at the earth and there isn’t any resistance stopping them from meeting and yet the sun stays the same distance away from the earth!
*we know this whenever we see a solar eclipse*

These are the types of people the Media News Outlets allow to become famous:

Making an ‘Ass’ out of ‘U’ and ‘Me’

In order to believe a victim, you have to be listening to a victim.

Claiming to be a victim doesn’t always make it so.

In this modern era, have we elevated assumption to proof positive?

Steven Crowder does a wonderful job of juxtaposing this new phenomena with the trial scene in ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ and does it in just over two minutes…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkQUdFMF0Zs