In order for a Theory to be considered scientific, empirical evidence is required.
In order for the primate species to be linked in an evolutionary chain, they placed a supposed ancestor at the base of the branches. The problem with this is there is no evidence for the existence of these supposed ancestors (which makes the model an unscientific one).
I've placed a target where the fictional ancestors need to be in order for the model to work:
The location of the target is where a fictional (no fossil record of this ancestor) animal was placed within the evolutionary model:
Possible cherry picking? Tell us a little more about the fossils they HAVE found. And then tell us how the genetic code with its indels and embedded viral markers allow for strong inductive arguments regarding relations among species and families. There is no point at which the lineage of every organism, traced through reasonable lines of ancestry cannot be connected to the awesomely beautiful 'tree' of life.
ReplyDeleteNone of the fossils found are ancestors of species on different branches, correct?
Delete