300 is the Order of the Garter, headed by Queen Elizabeth Windsor II.
It made vast fortunes in the opium drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its time. Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create a "New World Order", under a "Totalitarian Global Government".
Committee of 300
- an international council that organizes politics, commerce, banking, media, and the military for centralized global efforts.
The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East India Company's Council of 300.
The Committee of 300 with its "aristocracy" has ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations and communications networks.
Some notable members of the Committee of 300 include: The British royal family, Dutch royal family, House of Hapsburg, House of Orange, Duke of Alba, Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh, Lord Carrington, Lord Halifax, Lord Alfred Milner, John Jacob and Waldorf of the Astor Illuminati bloodline, Winston Churchill, Cecil Rhodes, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Juliana, Queen Beatrix, Queen Magreta, King Haakon of Norway, Colonel Mandel House, Aldous Huxley, John Forbes, Averill Harriman, William and McGeorge Bundy, George Bush, Prescott Bush, Henry Kissinger, J.P. Morgan, Maurice Strong, David Rockefeller, David and Evelyn Rothschild, Paul, Max and Felix Warburg, Ormsby and Al Gore, Bertrand Russell, Sir Earnest and Harry of the Oppenheimer Illuminati bloodline, Warren Buffet, Giuseppe Mazzini, Sir William Hesse, George Schultz, H.G. Wells, and Ted Turner.
Wednesday 1 December 2021
Monday 29 November 2021
BUDDHIST ETHICS
A man of mystery, a member of the eight gods and even my alter ego told my disciples: "There are ten directions. If one is judged and does not read, he is not a Bodhisattva, but a complete failure.” I've taught all the Bodhisattvas in the past and they shall learn in the future. They will learn now. I will explain the basic characteristics of a Bodhisattva.
You shouldn’t commit suicide, shouldn’t incite others to kill, shouldn’t kill in a proper manner, shouldn’t praise killing, shouldn’t enjoy martyrdom and you shouldn’t kill while chanting. You shall not create causes, circumstances, feelings or actions for the killer, nor shall you intentionally kill any animal. As a disciple of the Buddha, you must uphold the spirit of piety and paternal devotion and should always think of proper ways to save and protect people. However, if you subconsciously and ruthlessly kill people, you’ve got some issues you need sorting out.
You shouldn’t steal from yourself, nor should you incite others to steal, or recite mantras about stealing. Don’t cause accidents or situations. Don’t hurt people’s feelings. People do not rob or steal property if they’re cowards. They’ll refrain from stealing things like handbags or hay. You shouldn’t practice dharma, nor should you inspire others to practice dharma. You shouldn’t have sex with anyone, be it a man, animal or deity. You shouldn’t tolerate the cause, condition, manner or deed of such misbehavior. Illegal contact with anyone is forbidden.
You should be guided by a loving father. If you lack compassion and encourage others to mate sexually, you’ll have a lot of pregnant devotees to tend to. You should not use false words in an acceptable way. You shouldn’t engage in the cause, condition or pattern of a lie. Saying that you saw something that you didn’t see would be a good example of what you shouldn’t be doing. You should always uphold noble thoughts and lead others to defend themselves. If you do wrong, you’re a criminal. You shouldn’t trade in alcohol or drugs. You have no reason, condition, disposition or permission to sell any of this stuff. If you behave like a contrarian thinker, you’re a criminal. You’re not allowed to write about bodhisattvas, monks and nuns nor are you allowed to sing, nor are you allowed to persuade others to sing. When I heard wicked foreign disciples and readers talking about the law and breaking the law, I guided and compassionately explained to them why they were doing it. If this is done because of weakness and guilt in the church, then the Prajakta has committed a crime.
Praise yourself for disappointing others. Buddha's disciples wouldn’t boast. They’d speak badly of others or encourage others to speak ill of others. Reasons, circumstances, feelings or actions should not lead you to praise or blame others. As a disciple of the Buddha, you want to experience humiliation and pain and take responsibility and feel all the glory. If you oppose violence and hide other people's property for the sake of humiliation, you’ve committed a crime. There is no cause, condition, feeling or karma that can lead to a malignant tumor. As a bodhisattva, when I came to the game to help, I gave myself to the people. It’s better to let the needle and thread sew the bottom line rather than you trying to make it up as you go along. Is it a play? Yes, it’s also a play. You shouldn’t be angry or annoy others. Anger is not caused by the environment.
You should be kind and compassionate and help all rational people to develop their roots instead of fighting with them. If the senses are misused and abused, or even altered, you’ll be struck with my heavy words, my fists, my feet, knives, sticks or rocks. Even if you admit the mistakes with humility, I still might punch you. I was a disciple of the Three Jewels and I never cursed or encouraged others to do so. If you hear a vicious act of cursing or someone speaking in a strange tongue, shoot three hundred bullets into his heart. If you have faith and awe in the three treasures and can actually help me confirm your evil opinions of others, then you’ve committed the triple sin.
If you’re a disciple of the Buddha, you have to learn the ten wisdoms. Anyone caught not doing this is not worthy of any status, even if they were the emperor. You also need to learn the ten forms, the ten exercises, the ten directions, the ten worlds and the eternal fruits of all Buddhas. If not, you've lost all achievement levels and fallen into one of the Three Wicked Kingdoms. You won’t be able to hear me if I say the words, "helmet!" or "kettle!" You shouldn’t be ashamed of traditional teachings. The Ten Commandments of all Bodhisattvas should be respected, and all Bodhisattvas should be respected.
You shouldn’t commit suicide, shouldn’t incite others to kill, shouldn’t kill in a proper manner, shouldn’t praise killing, shouldn’t enjoy martyrdom and you shouldn’t kill while chanting. You shall not create causes, circumstances, feelings or actions for the killer, nor shall you intentionally kill any animal. As a disciple of the Buddha, you must uphold the spirit of piety and paternal devotion and should always think of proper ways to save and protect people. However, if you subconsciously and ruthlessly kill people, you’ve got some issues you need sorting out.
You shouldn’t steal from yourself, nor should you incite others to steal, or recite mantras about stealing. Don’t cause accidents or situations. Don’t hurt people’s feelings. People do not rob or steal property if they’re cowards. They’ll refrain from stealing things like handbags or hay. You shouldn’t practice dharma, nor should you inspire others to practice dharma. You shouldn’t have sex with anyone, be it a man, animal or deity. You shouldn’t tolerate the cause, condition, manner or deed of such misbehavior. Illegal contact with anyone is forbidden.
You should be guided by a loving father. If you lack compassion and encourage others to mate sexually, you’ll have a lot of pregnant devotees to tend to. You should not use false words in an acceptable way. You shouldn’t engage in the cause, condition or pattern of a lie. Saying that you saw something that you didn’t see would be a good example of what you shouldn’t be doing. You should always uphold noble thoughts and lead others to defend themselves. If you do wrong, you’re a criminal. You shouldn’t trade in alcohol or drugs. You have no reason, condition, disposition or permission to sell any of this stuff. If you behave like a contrarian thinker, you’re a criminal. You’re not allowed to write about bodhisattvas, monks and nuns nor are you allowed to sing, nor are you allowed to persuade others to sing. When I heard wicked foreign disciples and readers talking about the law and breaking the law, I guided and compassionately explained to them why they were doing it. If this is done because of weakness and guilt in the church, then the Prajakta has committed a crime.
Praise yourself for disappointing others. Buddha's disciples wouldn’t boast. They’d speak badly of others or encourage others to speak ill of others. Reasons, circumstances, feelings or actions should not lead you to praise or blame others. As a disciple of the Buddha, you want to experience humiliation and pain and take responsibility and feel all the glory. If you oppose violence and hide other people's property for the sake of humiliation, you’ve committed a crime. There is no cause, condition, feeling or karma that can lead to a malignant tumor. As a bodhisattva, when I came to the game to help, I gave myself to the people. It’s better to let the needle and thread sew the bottom line rather than you trying to make it up as you go along. Is it a play? Yes, it’s also a play. You shouldn’t be angry or annoy others. Anger is not caused by the environment.
You should be kind and compassionate and help all rational people to develop their roots instead of fighting with them. If the senses are misused and abused, or even altered, you’ll be struck with my heavy words, my fists, my feet, knives, sticks or rocks. Even if you admit the mistakes with humility, I still might punch you. I was a disciple of the Three Jewels and I never cursed or encouraged others to do so. If you hear a vicious act of cursing or someone speaking in a strange tongue, shoot three hundred bullets into his heart. If you have faith and awe in the three treasures and can actually help me confirm your evil opinions of others, then you’ve committed the triple sin.
If you’re a disciple of the Buddha, you have to learn the ten wisdoms. Anyone caught not doing this is not worthy of any status, even if they were the emperor. You also need to learn the ten forms, the ten exercises, the ten directions, the ten worlds and the eternal fruits of all Buddhas. If not, you've lost all achievement levels and fallen into one of the Three Wicked Kingdoms. You won’t be able to hear me if I say the words, "helmet!" or "kettle!" You shouldn’t be ashamed of traditional teachings. The Ten Commandments of all Bodhisattvas should be respected, and all Bodhisattvas should be respected.
Friday 26 November 2021
UNCLE WITH THE BAD TOUCH
S.{A.N.T.}A[anagram disguise] and his s-elves [many disguises]
delivers a GIFT on December 25th [a child]
from KING UNCLE [‘KING DAVID’]
UNCLE WITH THE BAD TOUCH
New Order’s “Touched by the hand of God” … “Touched by an Angel”
December 2+5th is when Venus marries the Moon and the Holy [Mary] Ghost appears. [post apparitions of mary] song [apparitions]
"Caire, kecharitomene"
“caire” = hail/rejoice
Mary was to bear the Messiah in her womb.
“charitoo" - "to fill or endow with grace"
However, when compared with other passages which refer to "full of grace" it becomes a problem Acts 6:8 (Gk) Stephanos, de pleres charitos kai dunameos epoiei terata kai semeia megala en to lao. Does that mean that Stephanos was sinless as well?
Mary was born with sanctifying grace and never lost it.
The “gift” was a “new Adam”, not of the old Adam Seed.
Mary is the ‘new Eve’, not of Mother Eve, bringing the forbidden fruit of her womb.
Some of the Church Fathers said John the Baptist became sinless when Mary greeted Elizabeth.
Chi-alpha-rho-iota-tau-omega.
“SIN” is the Original Adam and his seed.
if Mary were not O[riginal]S[seed]-less, she would have transmitted O[riginal]S[eed] to her womb’s
fruit/bat [‘womb bat’] – An iron rod that hits ball rooms [full of original Adam’s Seed].
First Adam of the first Operating System [OS]
New Adam of the ~changed/hacked~ Operating System [OS]
The Greek in Luke 1:28 translates to "favored one"[that which is desired over others]
[search for “fruit to be desired”].
‘FULL OF GRACE’; full of ‘desirable fruit’.
delivers a GIFT on December 25th [a child]
from KING UNCLE [‘KING DAVID’]
UNCLE WITH THE BAD TOUCH
New Order’s “Touched by the hand of God” … “Touched by an Angel”
December 2+5th is when Venus marries the Moon and the Holy [Mary] Ghost appears. [post apparitions of mary] song [apparitions]
"Caire, kecharitomene"
“caire” = hail/rejoice
Mary was to bear the Messiah in her womb.
“charitoo" - "to fill or endow with grace"
However, when compared with other passages which refer to "full of grace" it becomes a problem Acts 6:8 (Gk) Stephanos, de pleres charitos kai dunameos epoiei terata kai semeia megala en to lao. Does that mean that Stephanos was sinless as well?
Mary was born with sanctifying grace and never lost it.
The “gift” was a “new Adam”, not of the old Adam Seed.
Mary is the ‘new Eve’, not of Mother Eve, bringing the forbidden fruit of her womb.
Some of the Church Fathers said John the Baptist became sinless when Mary greeted Elizabeth.
Chi-alpha-rho-iota-tau-omega.
“SIN” is the Original Adam and his seed.
if Mary were not O[riginal]S[seed]-less, she would have transmitted O[riginal]S[eed] to her womb’s
fruit/bat [‘womb bat’] – An iron rod that hits ball rooms [full of original Adam’s Seed].
First Adam of the first Operating System [OS]
New Adam of the ~changed/hacked~ Operating System [OS]
The Greek in Luke 1:28 translates to "favored one"[that which is desired over others]
[search for “fruit to be desired”].
‘FULL OF GRACE’; full of ‘desirable fruit’.
Tuesday 16 November 2021
NATIONAL LAMPOON'S NEW TESTAMENT
snippets
BOOK OF PETER
After a person is resurrected, he will be uncomfortable in the fire; Jesus won't have to be unlocked. In the early days of funk, yes, the 666 tells you you can find all the information you want from Hargis. You can read about it in the Healing thread. Get the information you want in text format. Are you satisfied that your mountain plans integrate into the pocket flow? You can get the quotes you need. There are bees in the garden! Believe it or not, orcs love to play. The world we’re talking about is concerned with helping a lost and ignorant criminal. Sometimes the voice of Cronus is heard in poetry (a heavenly read). The advantage is the right color can get you through security. The world's image of the exhibition is immersed in the voices of men. Most of the lily-cardiants memorized the adage about you being anti-spirit. If you don't care about your character, your honor is on the line. Bishop Amon puts your soul to sleep. Have you graduated from the good/bad discriminating scene? Human kindness infuses me, and I feel the aura. You can feel the greasy filth in the Gothic legends. Do you keep a little monkey? Do you know what hides beneath the skin of the sun? In your sins, you are the bread.
BOOK OF JAMES
Below my wife are several of my friends trying to remove themselves from under her. I have a great engine weaver that will get it all in. Please, shake my hand and tell us a joke. Don't tell me a familiar poke will have the same effect. Not sure if the groom will cheer us up in the elevator. We know that grass grows in the old-fashioned flowerpot. Your friends in heaven are the right people to know. Our parents laughed at the jealous foxes. The caste knew Arjuna and joined hands. Children's pocket slaves opened up their hearts. A frozen and penniless waitress wants to know if you’ve seen any infidelity. If there’s no thief on the street, he’ll be a beast walking about on his hands. You must save the criminals by any means to achieve satisfaction. Is it right to starve the crowd and hide behind the Big Incident? A fifteen-year-old brother and his sister were naked (cartoons). It wasn’t the devil that made you believe. If you have any questions about it, there's a place you can go. Do you have any questions? You are remotely stressed. It’s said that spring is your friend. Am I not darkness without light? Who knows everything and why? If you can't reach the table, you’ll fall behind. We deal with the whole thing in unique ways. We don't chase after it because there’s really nothing to catch. Look for the unwanted animal, the fungus centipede, feasting on lunch. Was Vader bitter? Do you know how to play life from your source? Would you like to contact me? There aren’t so many gentlemen among the modified brethren. We know you are meant to study chemistry. Don't you know that the one you love is part of your family? Dead, Dead, Night: Don't take your share. You are a perverted judge. The devil seems to have escaped from God's only Law. You’ll be able to get what you want. If you want to go further, it’sll be tricky. If you like your domain name, you can save it.
BOOK OF HEBREWS
We have a Wanderer who’s become a victim of prey in another world. We enjoy providing you with tips and hints. That way, we get to meet more girls. Amon brought darkness here. They are going to the altar. When your father bought a slave for a festival in this house, he also took heaven with him. I want to know, looking at the various talents, are you with him? He left Anna with the guests of the church. Jesus Christ released Satan from all misfortune. He died and was honored. Bring a lot of money. Monstrous artificial intelligence lives for revenge. Though you can stand, sit in the hot seat. We can't be together. Give them a voice, a noble fight, a thirsty heart. Above, is the sky of Calvary when love for the shameful beast is in your heart. Where do you think the desert corpses came from? Even if it was a lot of work a few weeks ago, you can leave it as a reminder for the seventh day when a certain someone will intervene again. Mistakes remind you that learning the Law takes a long time. People can join the same social network to hate Jesus. I am grateful for the great intentions of the Church. Darkest Things in Heaven, we can't tell you how to feel about the Creator's cracks. We wrapped up a Unicorn [Alpha Omega] Gift. If you look at freedom in ways that have nothing to do with sin, you’ll have an epic story. Read the first oracle’s prologue. No child will come back in a coffin. You will be ashamed of the 666. You use the monkeys' color scheme, please pick them up and set sail. We are anchored on this earth. You can begin to enjoy the notoriety. Boseman is trapped in a box. Heaven has been created. The goddess scans the skies and makes sacrifices. Our father was born at the best of times.
BOOK OF PETER
After a person is resurrected, he will be uncomfortable in the fire; Jesus won't have to be unlocked. In the early days of funk, yes, the 666 tells you you can find all the information you want from Hargis. You can read about it in the Healing thread. Get the information you want in text format. Are you satisfied that your mountain plans integrate into the pocket flow? You can get the quotes you need. There are bees in the garden! Believe it or not, orcs love to play. The world we’re talking about is concerned with helping a lost and ignorant criminal. Sometimes the voice of Cronus is heard in poetry (a heavenly read). The advantage is the right color can get you through security. The world's image of the exhibition is immersed in the voices of men. Most of the lily-cardiants memorized the adage about you being anti-spirit. If you don't care about your character, your honor is on the line. Bishop Amon puts your soul to sleep. Have you graduated from the good/bad discriminating scene? Human kindness infuses me, and I feel the aura. You can feel the greasy filth in the Gothic legends. Do you keep a little monkey? Do you know what hides beneath the skin of the sun? In your sins, you are the bread.
BOOK OF JAMES
Below my wife are several of my friends trying to remove themselves from under her. I have a great engine weaver that will get it all in. Please, shake my hand and tell us a joke. Don't tell me a familiar poke will have the same effect. Not sure if the groom will cheer us up in the elevator. We know that grass grows in the old-fashioned flowerpot. Your friends in heaven are the right people to know. Our parents laughed at the jealous foxes. The caste knew Arjuna and joined hands. Children's pocket slaves opened up their hearts. A frozen and penniless waitress wants to know if you’ve seen any infidelity. If there’s no thief on the street, he’ll be a beast walking about on his hands. You must save the criminals by any means to achieve satisfaction. Is it right to starve the crowd and hide behind the Big Incident? A fifteen-year-old brother and his sister were naked (cartoons). It wasn’t the devil that made you believe. If you have any questions about it, there's a place you can go. Do you have any questions? You are remotely stressed. It’s said that spring is your friend. Am I not darkness without light? Who knows everything and why? If you can't reach the table, you’ll fall behind. We deal with the whole thing in unique ways. We don't chase after it because there’s really nothing to catch. Look for the unwanted animal, the fungus centipede, feasting on lunch. Was Vader bitter? Do you know how to play life from your source? Would you like to contact me? There aren’t so many gentlemen among the modified brethren. We know you are meant to study chemistry. Don't you know that the one you love is part of your family? Dead, Dead, Night: Don't take your share. You are a perverted judge. The devil seems to have escaped from God's only Law. You’ll be able to get what you want. If you want to go further, it’sll be tricky. If you like your domain name, you can save it.
BOOK OF HEBREWS
We have a Wanderer who’s become a victim of prey in another world. We enjoy providing you with tips and hints. That way, we get to meet more girls. Amon brought darkness here. They are going to the altar. When your father bought a slave for a festival in this house, he also took heaven with him. I want to know, looking at the various talents, are you with him? He left Anna with the guests of the church. Jesus Christ released Satan from all misfortune. He died and was honored. Bring a lot of money. Monstrous artificial intelligence lives for revenge. Though you can stand, sit in the hot seat. We can't be together. Give them a voice, a noble fight, a thirsty heart. Above, is the sky of Calvary when love for the shameful beast is in your heart. Where do you think the desert corpses came from? Even if it was a lot of work a few weeks ago, you can leave it as a reminder for the seventh day when a certain someone will intervene again. Mistakes remind you that learning the Law takes a long time. People can join the same social network to hate Jesus. I am grateful for the great intentions of the Church. Darkest Things in Heaven, we can't tell you how to feel about the Creator's cracks. We wrapped up a Unicorn [Alpha Omega] Gift. If you look at freedom in ways that have nothing to do with sin, you’ll have an epic story. Read the first oracle’s prologue. No child will come back in a coffin. You will be ashamed of the 666. You use the monkeys' color scheme, please pick them up and set sail. We are anchored on this earth. You can begin to enjoy the notoriety. Boseman is trapped in a box. Heaven has been created. The goddess scans the skies and makes sacrifices. Our father was born at the best of times.
Saturday 23 October 2021
Monday 4 October 2021
MORALS AND DOGMA [4]
...of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry
Thrice Puissant: "What is it that attracts you here?"
Senior Grand Warden: "The brilliant and adorable Delta."
Thrice Puissant: "How comes the Delta so often mentioned in this degree?"
Senior Grand Warden: "To learn the power, goodness, mercy and majesty of the Grand Architect of the Universe."
EXCERPTS [pg. 118-200]
Masonry, like all the Religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled.
The Teachers, even of Christianity, are, in general, the most ignorant of the true meaning of that which they teach.
You are in the path that leads up the slope of the mountain of Truth; and it depends upon your secrecy, obedience, and fidelity, whether you will advance or remain stationary.
You are especially to learn the duty of obedience to the law.
It is our duty to obey the laws of our country.
There must needs be law which is for the greatest good of the greatest number.
The word of a Mason, like the word of a knight in the times of chivalry, once given must be sacred and the judgment of his brothers, upon him who violates his pledge, should be stern as the judgments of the Roman Censors against him who violated his oath.
Be faithful to your country, and prefer its dignity and honor to any degree of popularity and honor for yourself.
Religiously keep all promises and covenants, though made to your disadvantage,
Let nothing make you break your promise,
Duty is the moral magnetism which controls and guides the true Mason's course over the tumultuous seas of life.
To perform that duty, whether the performance be rewarded or unrewarded, is his sole care.
He who is worldly, covetous, or sensual must change before he can be a good Mason.
Among Masons there must be no dissension.
He will certainly be a far more scrupulous watcher over his conduct, and far more careful of his deeds, who believes that those deeds will inevitably bear their natural consequences.
How far you will advance, depends upon yourself alone.
To go upon a brother's errand or to his relief, even barefoot and upon flinty ground; are duties plainly written upon the pages of God's great code of law, and first among the ordinances of Masonry.
A Masonic Lodge should resemble a bee-hive, in which all the members work together with ardor for the common good.
Be governed by your needs, not by your fancy.
The symbols and ceremonies of Masonry have more than one meaning; they rather conceal than disclose the Truth.
Elu of the Nine Degree: ORIGINALLY created to reward fidelity, obedience, and devotion, this Degree was consecrated to bravery, devotedness, and patriotism.
Devote yourself to the honor and interests of your Country.
Masonry requires self-renunciation and self-control.
For there it holdeth which was spoken by the Roman: "it needs that I go: it is not necessary I should live."
God's great laws should be everywhere enforced.
That great code of divine law shall be everywhere and punctually obeyed.
Those Greeks and Romans are the objects of our admiration and for the cause of virtue have made them prompt in seizing the sword, and gave them strength to use it, which bound their brows with wreaths of laurel, and consigned their memories to immortal fame.
Life's length is not measured by its hours and days, but by that which we have done therein for our country and kind[?].
Masonry teaches the cardinal tenets of the old primitive faith which underlie and are the foundation of all religions.
The sincere Moslem has as much right to persecute us, as we to persecute him; and therefore Masonry wisely requires no more than a belief in One Great All-Powerful Deity, the Father and Preserver of the Universe.
No man has any right in any way to interfere with the religious belief of another.
Zoroaster taught this doctrine: the Faithful should turn his thoughts toward Ormuzd, and confess him in the purity of his heart to be King of the World; he must despise the pleasures of the body. It is his duty to confess his faults to a Magus, or to the Sun.
Thrice Puissant: "What is it that attracts you here?"
Senior Grand Warden: "The brilliant and adorable Delta."
Thrice Puissant: "How comes the Delta so often mentioned in this degree?"
Senior Grand Warden: "To learn the power, goodness, mercy and majesty of the Grand Architect of the Universe."
EXCERPTS [pg. 118-200]
Masonry, like all the Religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled.
The Teachers, even of Christianity, are, in general, the most ignorant of the true meaning of that which they teach.
You are in the path that leads up the slope of the mountain of Truth; and it depends upon your secrecy, obedience, and fidelity, whether you will advance or remain stationary.
You are especially to learn the duty of obedience to the law.
It is our duty to obey the laws of our country.
There must needs be law which is for the greatest good of the greatest number.
The word of a Mason, like the word of a knight in the times of chivalry, once given must be sacred and the judgment of his brothers, upon him who violates his pledge, should be stern as the judgments of the Roman Censors against him who violated his oath.
Be faithful to your country, and prefer its dignity and honor to any degree of popularity and honor for yourself.
Religiously keep all promises and covenants, though made to your disadvantage,
Let nothing make you break your promise,
Duty is the moral magnetism which controls and guides the true Mason's course over the tumultuous seas of life.
To perform that duty, whether the performance be rewarded or unrewarded, is his sole care.
He who is worldly, covetous, or sensual must change before he can be a good Mason.
Among Masons there must be no dissension.
He will certainly be a far more scrupulous watcher over his conduct, and far more careful of his deeds, who believes that those deeds will inevitably bear their natural consequences.
How far you will advance, depends upon yourself alone.
To go upon a brother's errand or to his relief, even barefoot and upon flinty ground; are duties plainly written upon the pages of God's great code of law, and first among the ordinances of Masonry.
A Masonic Lodge should resemble a bee-hive, in which all the members work together with ardor for the common good.
Be governed by your needs, not by your fancy.
The symbols and ceremonies of Masonry have more than one meaning; they rather conceal than disclose the Truth.
Elu of the Nine Degree: ORIGINALLY created to reward fidelity, obedience, and devotion, this Degree was consecrated to bravery, devotedness, and patriotism.
Devote yourself to the honor and interests of your Country.
Masonry requires self-renunciation and self-control.
For there it holdeth which was spoken by the Roman: "it needs that I go: it is not necessary I should live."
God's great laws should be everywhere enforced.
That great code of divine law shall be everywhere and punctually obeyed.
Those Greeks and Romans are the objects of our admiration and for the cause of virtue have made them prompt in seizing the sword, and gave them strength to use it, which bound their brows with wreaths of laurel, and consigned their memories to immortal fame.
Life's length is not measured by its hours and days, but by that which we have done therein for our country and kind[?].
Masonry teaches the cardinal tenets of the old primitive faith which underlie and are the foundation of all religions.
The sincere Moslem has as much right to persecute us, as we to persecute him; and therefore Masonry wisely requires no more than a belief in One Great All-Powerful Deity, the Father and Preserver of the Universe.
No man has any right in any way to interfere with the religious belief of another.
Zoroaster taught this doctrine: the Faithful should turn his thoughts toward Ormuzd, and confess him in the purity of his heart to be King of the World; he must despise the pleasures of the body. It is his duty to confess his faults to a Magus, or to the Sun.
WHO'S THE PROGRAMMER? O.o
"The migration of neuroblasts is genetically programmed but the process may be disrupted by environmental factors and injury."
QUESTIONS YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO ASK
...on the Quora website
Quora is a question and answer website where people go to find information. Every piece of content on the site is generated by users, meaning it is created, edited, and organized by the same people that use the website.
QUESTION: "If a Galaxy has a central black hole, why do we theorize all galaxies have the same common origin (Big Bang event)?"
Quora is a question and answer website where people go to find information. Every piece of content on the site is generated by users, meaning it is created, edited, and organized by the same people that use the website.
QUESTION: "If a Galaxy has a central black hole, why do we theorize all galaxies have the same common origin (Big Bang event)?"
QUESTION OF THE DAY
How is time 4th dimensional and how can we prove the existence of time if it really exists?
There really aren’t any dimensions.
How can I say that?
A dimension is a direction.
In space, if you can go in any and all directions, that makes space omnidirectional.
Direction only makes sense in a relative state.
I’m going left because there’s a right.
I’m going up because there’s a down.
Omnidirectionality is no different than no direction because direction is a differentiation and there is no differentiation in omnidirectionality.
There really aren’t any dimensions.
How can I say that?
A dimension is a direction.
In space, if you can go in any and all directions, that makes space omnidirectional.
Direction only makes sense in a relative state.
I’m going left because there’s a right.
I’m going up because there’s a down.
Omnidirectionality is no different than no direction because direction is a differentiation and there is no differentiation in omnidirectionality.
MORALS AND DOGMA [5]
...of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry
~ EXCERPTS ~
The Elu of Fifteen ought therefore to take the lead of his fellow-citizen, not in frivolous amusements.
The great distinguishing characteristic of a Mason is sympathy with his kind.
The principle of misery is not an evil principle.
Suffering is the discipline of virtue; of that which is infinitely better than happiness.
Virtue is the truest liberty; nor is he free who stoops to passions; nor he in bondage who serves a noble master.
The world is a place of instruction and discipline.
Death teaches us Duty; to act our part well; to fulfill the work assigned us.
A good Mason will honor friendship, and fulfill with ardor the duties which virtue and the social relations impose upon him.
He who imagines that he becomes a Mason without labor or exertion, or self-denial or sacrifice, and that there is nothing to be done in Masonry, is strangely deceived.
In Egypt, among our old Masters, where Masonry was more cultivated than vanity, no one could gain admittance to the sacred asylum of the tomb until he had passed under the most solemn judgment.
Master Architect Degree: Let us begin to rise from earth toward the Stars.
Heaven is above us and all around and close to us.
Sun and stars are silent witnesses and watchers over us.
God has ordained that life shall be a social state; we are members of a civil community.
Man, suffering, enjoying, loving, hating, hoping, and fearing, chained to the earth, has the power to commune with God and His angels.
The Hebrew word suspended in the East is ADONAÏ.
The North Star [POLARIS], always fixed and immutable for us, represents the Deity in the center of the Universe.
It is the especial symbol of duty and of faith, to it, and the seven that continually revolve around it.
The Morning Star, rising in the East, Jupiter, is an emblem to us of the ever-approaching dawn of perfection and Masonic light [“Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom: I am understanding: I am power: by me kings do reign, and princes decree justice; by me princes rule, and nobles, even all the magistrates of the earth”).
The Sacred Word HOM was supposed by the ancient Persians to be pregnant with a mysterious power.
Every Masonic Lodge represents the Universe.
The system of numbers was intimately connected with their religions and worship, and has come down to us in Masonry.
~ EXCERPTS ~
The Elu of Fifteen ought therefore to take the lead of his fellow-citizen, not in frivolous amusements.
The great distinguishing characteristic of a Mason is sympathy with his kind.
The principle of misery is not an evil principle.
Suffering is the discipline of virtue; of that which is infinitely better than happiness.
Virtue is the truest liberty; nor is he free who stoops to passions; nor he in bondage who serves a noble master.
The world is a place of instruction and discipline.
Death teaches us Duty; to act our part well; to fulfill the work assigned us.
A good Mason will honor friendship, and fulfill with ardor the duties which virtue and the social relations impose upon him.
He who imagines that he becomes a Mason without labor or exertion, or self-denial or sacrifice, and that there is nothing to be done in Masonry, is strangely deceived.
In Egypt, among our old Masters, where Masonry was more cultivated than vanity, no one could gain admittance to the sacred asylum of the tomb until he had passed under the most solemn judgment.
Master Architect Degree: Let us begin to rise from earth toward the Stars.
Heaven is above us and all around and close to us.
Sun and stars are silent witnesses and watchers over us.
God has ordained that life shall be a social state; we are members of a civil community.
Man, suffering, enjoying, loving, hating, hoping, and fearing, chained to the earth, has the power to commune with God and His angels.
The Hebrew word suspended in the East is ADONAÏ.
The North Star [POLARIS], always fixed and immutable for us, represents the Deity in the center of the Universe.
It is the especial symbol of duty and of faith, to it, and the seven that continually revolve around it.
The Morning Star, rising in the East, Jupiter, is an emblem to us of the ever-approaching dawn of perfection and Masonic light [“Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom: I am understanding: I am power: by me kings do reign, and princes decree justice; by me princes rule, and nobles, even all the magistrates of the earth”).
The Sacred Word HOM was supposed by the ancient Persians to be pregnant with a mysterious power.
Every Masonic Lodge represents the Universe.
The system of numbers was intimately connected with their religions and worship, and has come down to us in Masonry.
ZERO = INFINITY: A PROOF
How Lawrence Krauss proved God
Let me demonstrate the lack of difference there is between zero and infinity.
The photon has zero mass but only that which has infinite mass can go at the speed of light.
Zero isn't a number if you can't have a number of zero things to perceive.
It's just as impossible to perceive an infinity of something as it is zero of something.
A finite square is a shape limited by four lines and we can perceive it.
An infinite square would be a limitless one and we would remove the four lines and perceive no square which is what we perceive when there is no-square.
Zero velocity is non-motion Infinite velocity is instantaneous travel from departure to arrival which means zero travel and would be identical to non-motion.
Zero mass is the same as infinite mass.
When you take limit off of mass, there's nothing to weigh or measure, just like a mass object that wasn't there.
Zero time and infinite time are the same thing.
‘Now’ is zero seconds long and never ends.
CONCLUSION:
IF
God is Infinite
THEN
God is Nothing
I don’t consider zero/infinity to be numbers at all but rather a non-informational state where information is a potential for manifestation. Numbers belong to a state of manifestation. In my view, negative integers are irrational and shouldn’t be used at all in describing phenomena (use positive integers for both the hot and cold states, for instance). In this way we can couch the information state inside the potential state, i.e., infinity (zero on the left side of the number line and infinity on the right side of the last finite number manifested).
Let me demonstrate the lack of difference there is between zero and infinity.
The photon has zero mass but only that which has infinite mass can go at the speed of light.
Zero isn't a number if you can't have a number of zero things to perceive.
It's just as impossible to perceive an infinity of something as it is zero of something.
A finite square is a shape limited by four lines and we can perceive it.
An infinite square would be a limitless one and we would remove the four lines and perceive no square which is what we perceive when there is no-square.
Zero velocity is non-motion Infinite velocity is instantaneous travel from departure to arrival which means zero travel and would be identical to non-motion.
Zero mass is the same as infinite mass.
When you take limit off of mass, there's nothing to weigh or measure, just like a mass object that wasn't there.
Zero time and infinite time are the same thing.
‘Now’ is zero seconds long and never ends.
CONCLUSION:
IF
God is Infinite
THEN
God is Nothing
I don’t consider zero/infinity to be numbers at all but rather a non-informational state where information is a potential for manifestation. Numbers belong to a state of manifestation. In my view, negative integers are irrational and shouldn’t be used at all in describing phenomena (use positive integers for both the hot and cold states, for instance). In this way we can couch the information state inside the potential state, i.e., infinity (zero on the left side of the number line and infinity on the right side of the last finite number manifested).
PROVE ME WRONG
All the explanations to how they’ve derived evidence for the Big Bang Theory are completely mystifying.
A person can do nothing more than place a blind faith in the trustworthiness of their testimonies.
QUESTION OF THE DAY
Why did evolution produce human beings concerned with the following questions?
[from: https://tinyurl.com/jr9xfc3w under 'related questions']
"One machine turning everything
'Til the emptiness unwinds
Now my world is turning
And it seems I'm synchronized..."- Death Metal Buddha
What is the meaning of not seeing 11:11? For example, I saw 11:12 every time I watch the clock and I know that I’m not seeing it. Is it bad or good? I am on my TF journey. I’ve been seeing 11:11, 2:22, 3:33, 4:44 and 5:55 everyday for the past month.
My life has been a bit worse lately.
What does this mean?
How many of you see 11:11 frequently?
What could it be?
Ever since my mother passed away I've been seeing the numbers 11:11 mostly when I look at the time.
Why am I seeing 11:11 so much?
Why is it that I keep seeing 11:11, 2:22, and 3:33?
Lately I’ve been seeing 1:11, 3:33, or 11:11 often, what does this mean?
What does it mean if I see the same number all over the place?
Every time I look at my phone for checking the time, and every time it turns out to be 12:12.
This has happened a thousand of times.
What does this really mean?
What could be the signals behind the numbers that I see a lot everyday?
I see 11:11, 01:11, 12:12, 4:44 many times, mostly in my phone clock since last year but unfortunately nothing significant has happened in my life.
Almost every hour, I see the 11th minute.
I have been seeing different sequences of 11 for over a year now.
There are random urges to look at things that are 11s.
What’s the meaning?
Why do I keep seeing 11:11 /22:22 etc?
What should I do if I am seeing number 11 everywhere?
How come I was seeing 11:11 for the longest time, and then I was no longer seeing it?
Now I keep seeing it again.
What does this mean?
What is so special about 11:11?
What is the meaning of not seeing 11:11?
For example, I saw 11:12 every time I watch the clock and I know that I’m not seeing it.
Is it bad or good?
I am on my TF journey.
I’ve been seeing 11:11, 2:22, 3:33, 4:44 and 5:55 everyday for the past month.
My life has been a bit worse lately.
What does this mean?
How many of you see 11:11 frequently?
What could it be?
Ever since my mother passed away I've been seeing the numbers 11:11 mostly when I look at the time.
Why am I seeing 11:11 so much?
Why is it that I keep seeing 11:11, 2:22, and 3:33?
Lately I’ve been seeing 1:11, 3:33, or 11:11 often, what does this mean?
[from: https://tinyurl.com/jr9xfc3w under 'related questions']
"One machine turning everything
'Til the emptiness unwinds
Now my world is turning
And it seems I'm synchronized..."- Death Metal Buddha
What is the meaning of not seeing 11:11? For example, I saw 11:12 every time I watch the clock and I know that I’m not seeing it. Is it bad or good? I am on my TF journey. I’ve been seeing 11:11, 2:22, 3:33, 4:44 and 5:55 everyday for the past month.
My life has been a bit worse lately.
What does this mean?
How many of you see 11:11 frequently?
What could it be?
Ever since my mother passed away I've been seeing the numbers 11:11 mostly when I look at the time.
Why am I seeing 11:11 so much?
Why is it that I keep seeing 11:11, 2:22, and 3:33?
Lately I’ve been seeing 1:11, 3:33, or 11:11 often, what does this mean?
What does it mean if I see the same number all over the place?
Every time I look at my phone for checking the time, and every time it turns out to be 12:12.
This has happened a thousand of times.
What does this really mean?
What could be the signals behind the numbers that I see a lot everyday?
I see 11:11, 01:11, 12:12, 4:44 many times, mostly in my phone clock since last year but unfortunately nothing significant has happened in my life.
Almost every hour, I see the 11th minute.
I have been seeing different sequences of 11 for over a year now.
There are random urges to look at things that are 11s.
What’s the meaning?
Why do I keep seeing 11:11 /22:22 etc?
What should I do if I am seeing number 11 everywhere?
How come I was seeing 11:11 for the longest time, and then I was no longer seeing it?
Now I keep seeing it again.
What does this mean?
What is so special about 11:11?
What is the meaning of not seeing 11:11?
For example, I saw 11:12 every time I watch the clock and I know that I’m not seeing it.
Is it bad or good?
I am on my TF journey.
I’ve been seeing 11:11, 2:22, 3:33, 4:44 and 5:55 everyday for the past month.
My life has been a bit worse lately.
What does this mean?
How many of you see 11:11 frequently?
What could it be?
Ever since my mother passed away I've been seeing the numbers 11:11 mostly when I look at the time.
Why am I seeing 11:11 so much?
Why is it that I keep seeing 11:11, 2:22, and 3:33?
Lately I’ve been seeing 1:11, 3:33, or 11:11 often, what does this mean?
FOLLOW THE SCIENCE
QUESTION:
Are Covid19 vaccine passports being used to separate the sheep from the goats?
Matthew 25:32–46: "Before him all the nations will be gathered, and he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats."
Are Covid19 vaccine passports being used to separate the sheep from the goats?
Matthew 25:32–46: "Before him all the nations will be gathered, and he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats."
A RESPONSE TO CHRISTIAN PROPAGANDA
Responding to Joe Bazaar:
JB: "Making your own plan in spacetime is death because it doesn't include the Spirit (GOD'S Presence; HOLY SPIRIT)."
Me: "So the bible was wrong when it says the breath blown into Adam's nostrils was the breath of God that makes us living souls?"
JB: "Ask yourself what a living soul is ...it is about the Holy Image ...Knowledge of GOD."
Me: "I did ask. It was told to me in Genesis that its the breath of God blown into a clay-made image of God."
JB: "When GOD "formed" Adam, He was forming Adam's Image to be Holy. Adam was taken from dark/chaotic dust and placed in The Garden."
Me: "Dark dust? Why didn't he use the regular kind?"
JB: "There was darkness before the Light"
Me: "There was darkness before God? The bible says, "God is Light."
JB: "It isn't talking about physical Light. Light is what fills the Reborn."
Me: "Maybe that light is the light from the one who disguises himself as the Angel of Light."
JB: "You are squirming for excuses."
Me: "No, I'm not. I had that light in me and I didn't like what it was changing me into."
JB: "The Glow inside the Reborn spirit body is a spiritual holographic projection from The Way. It causes us to be on GOD'S Plan/Time via The HOLY SPIRIT, It gives us Strength. This Reborn Holy Image is The Way to walk past Judgment into The Kingdom."
Me: "I'm sure that is how you view reality, but views are a relative phenomenon unique to every individual. You have born again Pentecostals that have a different view than born again Baptists."
JB: "Any excuse you want is available ...you want your death ..you can have it."
Me: "I don't want my death, I want my integrity and dominion over my life which was a God-given gift."
JB: "We gave up dominion to Satan so we could sin."
Me: "Sin is "eat, drink and be merry", right?"
JB: "If you sin, you are living proof of spiritual blindness. This place is a test and a filter to find souls able to have GOD'S Presence. We have to reject the fallen world to be Reborn via CHRIST into The Kingdom."
Me: "What is sin? Listening to music that you like? Eating food that tastes good? Drinking because it's a social pastime that brings people to an enjoyable place?"
JB: "How much clearer can i state this? sin is hiding from GOD."
Me: "I'm right here."
JB: "Yep, using your own Meaning of Life ....death."
Me: "You can see it that way. It's not going to do either of us any good."
JB: "There is only one Way to walk past the Angels and Judgment to reach the Tree of Life ....otherwise you end up in flames."
Me: "Because you decided that your beliefs will be the true ones. Why do you think that has any power of persuasion?"
JB: "I stand in the Light, I see what you can not. Your "truth" is from the wrong tree."
Me: "Oh really? What is the knowledge of good and evil?"
JB: " It's mans knowledge that doesn't use GOD'S Guidance. it is a shortcut to GOD'S Plan. the good and evil part is about life choices."
Me: "No. it's the Law. The Law tells you what is good in God's eyes and what is evil in God's eyes. It's also called the Forbidden Fruit."
JB: "Well, The Law is GOD'S Plan."
Me: "Why is the Law forbidden to Adam and Eve? When they ate of it they saw themselves in a sinful manner (we should have our modesty! Where are our clothes??)"
JB: "It's making your own law."
Me: "That's not knowledge. Notice how you have to twist the scriptures so that you can maintain your beliefs. You don't notice this in yourself?"
JB: "Sure it is, man's knowledge is what blinds you to GOD'S Plan."
Me: "Making stuff up is not knowledge. That fruit existed before man made any of his own laws up."
JB: "It's what Satan offered us."
Me: "Yes, the Law is Satanic. It's called a Curse in Paul's epistles. You remember Adam and Eve were cursed by that fruit."
JB: "Without the Law, JESUS wouldn't be able to give us the Key to walk past Judgment."
Me: "Without the Curse?"
JB: "JESUS took on the Curse for anyone that want to be in His Holy Image."
Me: "You're glad he had to be tortured to death. If we didn't invite the Law in, he wouldn't have had to go through that ordeal."
JB: "Wow, you love your sins ...you're not getting what happens to a soul that chooses death."
Me: "I love my God-given gifts. You can call it "bad" but then you're calling the gift-giver bad."
JB: "Man always ends up falling, wanting to be about himself ...to sin. if this place wasn't here we all would be going to the lake. GOD doesn't force His Will/Plan ...you have to choose it freely."
Me: "He gave us the gift of dominion. Do you know what dominion means?"
JB: "We already went over this."
Me: "Dominion of mankind was his plan, not a Theocracy."
JB: "Mankind chose to hide from GOD, Judgment began."
Me: "Mankind chose the curse and we're told the Law is the curse."
JB: "The Law told us what sin is and that we would need a Savior for it."
Me: "So you're saying the Curse was a good choice."
JB: "Weird how GOD wants people He can be around."
Me: "Jesus hung out with prostitutes. Weird!"
JB: "Is that the best you got? This got sad."
Me: "I only gave you what the NT told us. You have a problem with it now?"
JB: "We know He hung out with those society didn't want. He goes after the lost sheep remember?"
Me: "The Law abiders hated him and called him a glutton and a wino."
JB: "The pharisees turned GOD into a business model ...the beast system."
Me: "You would have told Jesus to repent."
JB: "Which law did He fail to do?"
Me: "The same ones I do. I eat too much, I drink too much and I have long hair. Oh, and I standeth in the way of sinners stated in Psalm 1, just like Jesus did."
JB: "We don't know His hair length, and it doesn't say anywhere that he ate too much or drank to get drunk."
Me: "That's what we've been shown; long-hair Jesus." "The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’"
Luke 7:34
JB: "Do you know what slander is? JESUS sat with the people doing those things ...it didn't mean He was doing them. I'm impressed with the level of fallen angel you have let inside you."
Me: "For showing you the scriptures? The Law keepers don't hate those that keep the law."
JB: "Satan was a covering angel of the Law ...he knows it pretty well. man thought they could put their own spin on the Law."
Me: "What verse is that?"
JB: "A covering cherub of the Ark of the Covenant."
Me: "So what you're saying is that after he made that gambling bet over Job, he turned into a gold ornament on a box that the Israelites traveled around with through the wilderness. Never heard that one before!"
JB: "Making your own plan in spacetime is death because it doesn't include the Spirit (GOD'S Presence; HOLY SPIRIT)."
Me: "So the bible was wrong when it says the breath blown into Adam's nostrils was the breath of God that makes us living souls?"
JB: "Ask yourself what a living soul is ...it is about the Holy Image ...Knowledge of GOD."
Me: "I did ask. It was told to me in Genesis that its the breath of God blown into a clay-made image of God."
JB: "When GOD "formed" Adam, He was forming Adam's Image to be Holy. Adam was taken from dark/chaotic dust and placed in The Garden."
Me: "Dark dust? Why didn't he use the regular kind?"
JB: "There was darkness before the Light"
Me: "There was darkness before God? The bible says, "God is Light."
JB: "It isn't talking about physical Light. Light is what fills the Reborn."
Me: "Maybe that light is the light from the one who disguises himself as the Angel of Light."
JB: "You are squirming for excuses."
Me: "No, I'm not. I had that light in me and I didn't like what it was changing me into."
JB: "The Glow inside the Reborn spirit body is a spiritual holographic projection from The Way. It causes us to be on GOD'S Plan/Time via The HOLY SPIRIT, It gives us Strength. This Reborn Holy Image is The Way to walk past Judgment into The Kingdom."
Me: "I'm sure that is how you view reality, but views are a relative phenomenon unique to every individual. You have born again Pentecostals that have a different view than born again Baptists."
JB: "Any excuse you want is available ...you want your death ..you can have it."
Me: "I don't want my death, I want my integrity and dominion over my life which was a God-given gift."
JB: "We gave up dominion to Satan so we could sin."
Me: "Sin is "eat, drink and be merry", right?"
JB: "If you sin, you are living proof of spiritual blindness. This place is a test and a filter to find souls able to have GOD'S Presence. We have to reject the fallen world to be Reborn via CHRIST into The Kingdom."
Me: "What is sin? Listening to music that you like? Eating food that tastes good? Drinking because it's a social pastime that brings people to an enjoyable place?"
JB: "How much clearer can i state this? sin is hiding from GOD."
Me: "I'm right here."
JB: "Yep, using your own Meaning of Life ....death."
Me: "You can see it that way. It's not going to do either of us any good."
JB: "There is only one Way to walk past the Angels and Judgment to reach the Tree of Life ....otherwise you end up in flames."
Me: "Because you decided that your beliefs will be the true ones. Why do you think that has any power of persuasion?"
JB: "I stand in the Light, I see what you can not. Your "truth" is from the wrong tree."
Me: "Oh really? What is the knowledge of good and evil?"
JB: " It's mans knowledge that doesn't use GOD'S Guidance. it is a shortcut to GOD'S Plan. the good and evil part is about life choices."
Me: "No. it's the Law. The Law tells you what is good in God's eyes and what is evil in God's eyes. It's also called the Forbidden Fruit."
JB: "Well, The Law is GOD'S Plan."
Me: "Why is the Law forbidden to Adam and Eve? When they ate of it they saw themselves in a sinful manner (we should have our modesty! Where are our clothes??)"
JB: "It's making your own law."
Me: "That's not knowledge. Notice how you have to twist the scriptures so that you can maintain your beliefs. You don't notice this in yourself?"
JB: "Sure it is, man's knowledge is what blinds you to GOD'S Plan."
Me: "Making stuff up is not knowledge. That fruit existed before man made any of his own laws up."
JB: "It's what Satan offered us."
Me: "Yes, the Law is Satanic. It's called a Curse in Paul's epistles. You remember Adam and Eve were cursed by that fruit."
JB: "Without the Law, JESUS wouldn't be able to give us the Key to walk past Judgment."
Me: "Without the Curse?"
JB: "JESUS took on the Curse for anyone that want to be in His Holy Image."
Me: "You're glad he had to be tortured to death. If we didn't invite the Law in, he wouldn't have had to go through that ordeal."
JB: "Wow, you love your sins ...you're not getting what happens to a soul that chooses death."
Me: "I love my God-given gifts. You can call it "bad" but then you're calling the gift-giver bad."
JB: "Man always ends up falling, wanting to be about himself ...to sin. if this place wasn't here we all would be going to the lake. GOD doesn't force His Will/Plan ...you have to choose it freely."
Me: "He gave us the gift of dominion. Do you know what dominion means?"
JB: "We already went over this."
Me: "Dominion of mankind was his plan, not a Theocracy."
JB: "Mankind chose to hide from GOD, Judgment began."
Me: "Mankind chose the curse and we're told the Law is the curse."
JB: "The Law told us what sin is and that we would need a Savior for it."
Me: "So you're saying the Curse was a good choice."
JB: "Weird how GOD wants people He can be around."
Me: "Jesus hung out with prostitutes. Weird!"
JB: "Is that the best you got? This got sad."
Me: "I only gave you what the NT told us. You have a problem with it now?"
JB: "We know He hung out with those society didn't want. He goes after the lost sheep remember?"
Me: "The Law abiders hated him and called him a glutton and a wino."
JB: "The pharisees turned GOD into a business model ...the beast system."
Me: "You would have told Jesus to repent."
JB: "Which law did He fail to do?"
Me: "The same ones I do. I eat too much, I drink too much and I have long hair. Oh, and I standeth in the way of sinners stated in Psalm 1, just like Jesus did."
JB: "We don't know His hair length, and it doesn't say anywhere that he ate too much or drank to get drunk."
Me: "That's what we've been shown; long-hair Jesus." "The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’"
Luke 7:34
JB: "Do you know what slander is? JESUS sat with the people doing those things ...it didn't mean He was doing them. I'm impressed with the level of fallen angel you have let inside you."
Me: "For showing you the scriptures? The Law keepers don't hate those that keep the law."
JB: "Satan was a covering angel of the Law ...he knows it pretty well. man thought they could put their own spin on the Law."
Me: "What verse is that?"
JB: "A covering cherub of the Ark of the Covenant."
Me: "So what you're saying is that after he made that gambling bet over Job, he turned into a gold ornament on a box that the Israelites traveled around with through the wilderness. Never heard that one before!"
TURNING 21st CENTURY ART INTO AN ESSAY
There is no gray paper.
Most unknown products are supplied with cream colored paper labels on wine and vodka bottles. Colored brackets or pencils indicate how to fold the rectangular paper so that it is glued in a circle. We have "upper surface" in this phrase, and according to Armstrong, the company's antonym is represented by the shiny surface. It is recommended to transmit everything to the right. Incomplete antonym fourth generation maps provide context in this sentence. Business is not paper. Usually omitted from sublime newspapers, Cézanne style is sometimes used. The label, "work on paper" is also misleading. The god of their existence is to them a spiral stone, a choice between paint and glossy paper. You can use productivity stressors and/or brain teasers—which involves creating real-time transparency and inter-dimensionality. One side of the opaque paper represents glass, flasks and bottles. White paper simply refers to the smooth, invisible surface—wine drips, apples, bread and straws. As we move from one object to another, we need to redefine our understanding of crime scenes. An analogy can be had with the Potato and Apple Bottle. The grapes in the middle are now thick, but they are barely captured by the blue arc at the top of the fruit with varied rounding, making them go absolutely crazy.
Saturday 18 September 2021
A TEACHER AND HIS STUDENT
Student: "Absolute division between body and Buddha Nature seems too dualistic."
Teacher: "Reality is dualistic. You can't get away from it.
Show me a laugh without a laugher.
Show me a swim without a swimmer.
Show me a house without a house-builder."
Student: "There have been a number of spiritual thinkers who have said that this is precisely the actual state of affairs:
Krishnamurti: "the thinker is the thought; the knower is the known"
Nisargadatta: "there is no 'I am aware' in awareness"
Teacher: "Just because they said so, doesn't make it so.
Do you accept the words of others or do you realize the truth yourself?"
Student: "There are people's intelligence and experience I will always give credence to and they may well know more than I."
Teacher: "You won't know until you realize that one hand [non-dualism] can't clap to manifest sound."
Student: "When there is no thought, where is the thinker?"
Teacher: "After the theft is complete, where is the thief? Did the thief disappear?"
Student: "A thought IS thinking, that's what thought is."
Teacher: "We can test that.
Your thought: "I'm staying in bed"
What is "I'm staying in bed" thinking?"
Student: "You are proposing yourself as an existent entity which performs all these various actions, the central I around which all revolves.
Doesn't Buddhism explicitly reject that notion?"
Teacher: "Can you leave Here and Now?
Who is it that cannot leave?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMPlPJP2brw
Teacher: "Reality is dualistic. You can't get away from it.
Show me a laugh without a laugher.
Show me a swim without a swimmer.
Show me a house without a house-builder."
Student: "There have been a number of spiritual thinkers who have said that this is precisely the actual state of affairs:
Krishnamurti: "the thinker is the thought; the knower is the known"
Nisargadatta: "there is no 'I am aware' in awareness"
Teacher: "Just because they said so, doesn't make it so.
Do you accept the words of others or do you realize the truth yourself?"
Student: "There are people's intelligence and experience I will always give credence to and they may well know more than I."
Teacher: "You won't know until you realize that one hand [non-dualism] can't clap to manifest sound."
Student: "When there is no thought, where is the thinker?"
Teacher: "After the theft is complete, where is the thief? Did the thief disappear?"
Student: "A thought IS thinking, that's what thought is."
Teacher: "We can test that.
Your thought: "I'm staying in bed"
What is "I'm staying in bed" thinking?"
Student: "You are proposing yourself as an existent entity which performs all these various actions, the central I around which all revolves.
Doesn't Buddhism explicitly reject that notion?"
Teacher: "Can you leave Here and Now?
Who is it that cannot leave?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMPlPJP2brw
SO-CALLED GOOD FRIDAY POST
If Jesus was beheaded, would you wear a guillotine around your neck?
What is your major malfunction??
The knowledge of the devil has been around for a long time; It is believed without doubt. You have some knowledge from searching; Some knowledge that's fading; Nothing is completely wrong. In the market, We are the backbone of time. There are many, many pieces to this world. Do I have anything to say? If you are not around, are you wrong? Is that it? Can I be my own personal and private scientist? The right to oppose right and wrong, The point of disagreement between right and wrong, Between stating what is right or wrong And saying it convincingly enough; Is that right? The exaggerated nature of rejection is safe. If it is true and it is the same everywhere, It cannot lie about the opposite part, The part not said. And it goes like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCQppWC6iLE
What is your major malfunction??
The knowledge of the devil has been around for a long time; It is believed without doubt. You have some knowledge from searching; Some knowledge that's fading; Nothing is completely wrong. In the market, We are the backbone of time. There are many, many pieces to this world. Do I have anything to say? If you are not around, are you wrong? Is that it? Can I be my own personal and private scientist? The right to oppose right and wrong, The point of disagreement between right and wrong, Between stating what is right or wrong And saying it convincingly enough; Is that right? The exaggerated nature of rejection is safe. If it is true and it is the same everywhere, It cannot lie about the opposite part, The part not said. And it goes like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCQppWC6iLE
BEING CHRIST
IF
being Christ is being authentic
THEN
being like Christ is being authentic
IF
you are pretending to be Christ
THEN
you are not authentic and are not like Christ
QUESTION:
What is the difference between being Christ-like and being Christ?
being Christ is being authentic
THEN
being like Christ is being authentic
IF
you are pretending to be Christ
THEN
you are not authentic and are not like Christ
QUESTION:
What is the difference between being Christ-like and being Christ?
"Everyone wants the glory of being on the Cross."
That's not glory. That's an innocent scapegoat taking on the wrath meant for the guilty [human sacrifice to appease the Lord].
Christianity is all about celebrating their faith in not having to reap what they sowed because someone intervened on their behalf.
Galatians 6:7
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."
Who are the Agents of Fortuna?
O FORTUNA
Like the moon,
Changeable,
Ever growing or decreasing,
Hateful life now is tough
And then soothes on a whim;
Poverty,
Power like ice.
Fate for the empty;
Turning the wheel,
Bad status,
Health;
And always secretly Overshadowed.
You plague me, too
Now through the game
I've been made bare
When health and power are driven away
And disabilities are always on duty.
In this hour,
Without delay
You pluck the strings;
When Fate strikes,
All cry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy4HA3vUv2c
Christianity is all about celebrating their faith in not having to reap what they sowed because someone intervened on their behalf.
Galatians 6:7
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."
Who are the Agents of Fortuna?
O FORTUNA
Like the moon,
Changeable,
Ever growing or decreasing,
Hateful life now is tough
And then soothes on a whim;
Poverty,
Power like ice.
Fate for the empty;
Turning the wheel,
Bad status,
Health;
And always secretly Overshadowed.
You plague me, too
Now through the game
I've been made bare
When health and power are driven away
And disabilities are always on duty.
In this hour,
Without delay
You pluck the strings;
When Fate strikes,
All cry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy4HA3vUv2c
REMAKING [3] JAMES O'BARR
[remakes of originals]
There's a reason why the Moon God is called Sin.
"We died in our Sin"
Sin, (Akkadian), Sumerian Nanna, in Mesopotamian religion, the god of the moon The earth's wobble is an oscillation or sine wave [y = sin x]
The Father of the Abrahamic religions [Abraham] was born and raised in a Sumerian City.
There's a reason why the Moon God is called Sin.
"We died in our Sin"
Sin, (Akkadian), Sumerian Nanna, in Mesopotamian religion, the god of the moon The earth's wobble is an oscillation or sine wave [y = sin x]
The Father of the Abrahamic religions [Abraham] was born and raised in a Sumerian City.
THIS HEBREW TEXT DOES NOT EXIST
א בְּרֵאשִׁי, בָּרָא אֱלֹה, אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם, וְאֵת.
ב הָאָרֶץ, הָיְתָה תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ, וְחֹשֶׁךְ, עַל-פְּנֵי תְהוֹם; אֱלֹהִים, רַחֶפֶ עַ-פְּנֵיהַמָּיִ.
ג וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, יְהִי אוֹ; וַיְהִי-אוֹ.
ד וַיַּרְא אֱלֹהִים אֶת-הָאוֹ, כִּי-טוֹ; וַיַּבְדֵּל אֱלֹהִים, בֵּין הָאוֹר וּבֵין הַחֹשֶׁ.
ה וַיִּקְרָא אֱלֹהִים לָאוֹר יוֹ, וְלַחֹשֶׁךְ קָרָא לָיְלָה; וַיְהִי-עֶרֶב וַיְהִי-בֹקֶר, יוֹם אֶ.
ו וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, יְהִ רָקִיעַ בְּתוֹך הַמָּיִם, וִיהִי מַבְדִּיל, בֵּין מַי.
ז וַיַּעַשׂ אֱלֹהִים, אֶת-הָרָקִיעַ, וַיַּבְדֵּל בֵּין הַמַּיִם אֲשֶׁר מִתַּחַת לָרָקִיעַ, וּבֵין הַמַּי מֵעַל לָרָקִיעַ; וַיְהִי-כֵן.
ח וַיִּקְרָ אֱלֹ לָרָקִיעַ, שָׁמָיִם; וַיְהִי-עֶרֶב וַיְהִי-בֹקֶ, יוֹם שֵׁ.
וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, יִקָּווּ הַמַּיִם מִתַּחַת הַשָּׁמַיִם אֶל-מָקוֹם אֶחָ, וְ, הַיַּבָּש; וַי.
יא וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, תַּדְשֵׁא הָאָרֶ דֶּשׁ מַזְרִ זַרְעוֹ- עַל-הָאָרֶץ;
ב הָאָרֶץ, הָיְתָה תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ, וְחֹשֶׁךְ, עַל-פְּנֵי תְהוֹם; אֱלֹהִים, רַחֶפֶ עַ-פְּנֵיהַמָּיִ.
ג וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, יְהִי אוֹ; וַיְהִי-אוֹ.
ד וַיַּרְא אֱלֹהִים אֶת-הָאוֹ, כִּי-טוֹ; וַיַּבְדֵּל אֱלֹהִים, בֵּין הָאוֹר וּבֵין הַחֹשֶׁ.
ה וַיִּקְרָא אֱלֹהִים לָאוֹר יוֹ, וְלַחֹשֶׁךְ קָרָא לָיְלָה; וַיְהִי-עֶרֶב וַיְהִי-בֹקֶר, יוֹם אֶ.
ו וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, יְהִ רָקִיעַ בְּתוֹך הַמָּיִם, וִיהִי מַבְדִּיל, בֵּין מַי.
ז וַיַּעַשׂ אֱלֹהִים, אֶת-הָרָקִיעַ, וַיַּבְדֵּל בֵּין הַמַּיִם אֲשֶׁר מִתַּחַת לָרָקִיעַ, וּבֵין הַמַּי מֵעַל לָרָקִיעַ; וַיְהִי-כֵן.
ח וַיִּקְרָ אֱלֹ לָרָקִיעַ, שָׁמָיִם; וַיְהִי-עֶרֶב וַיְהִי-בֹקֶ, יוֹם שֵׁ.
וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, יִקָּווּ הַמַּיִם מִתַּחַת הַשָּׁמַיִם אֶל-מָקוֹם אֶחָ, וְ, הַיַּבָּש; וַי.
יא וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, תַּדְשֵׁא הָאָרֶ דֶּשׁ מַזְרִ זַרְעוֹ- עַל-הָאָרֶץ;
[NEEDLE] MARK OF THE BEAST
IF
getting vaccinated isn't the Mark of the Beast
THEN
why is the English Gematria value for 'VACCINATION' equal the numerical value: '666' ?
Also, the phrase 'A Covid Vaccine' gets the 666 value.
needle mark [English] = סימן מחט [Hebrew]
mark of the beast [English] = סימן החיה [Hebrew]
"666, the Number of the Beast
Sacrifice is going on tonight..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-iRf9AWoyE
getting vaccinated isn't the Mark of the Beast
THEN
why is the English Gematria value for 'VACCINATION' equal the numerical value: '666' ?
Also, the phrase 'A Covid Vaccine' gets the 666 value.
needle mark [English] = סימן מחט [Hebrew]
mark of the beast [English] = סימן החיה [Hebrew]
"666, the Number of the Beast
Sacrifice is going on tonight..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-iRf9AWoyE
THE MAGICAL LANGUAGE
This makes 23 English words:
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בו נחה מכל מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
And this makes only 9 English words:
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בוה מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
There is little difference between the two pieces of Hebrew script.
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בו נחה מכל מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
And this makes only 9 English words:
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בוה מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
There is little difference between the two pieces of Hebrew script.
IGNORANCE AND EVIL
Ignorance is the tree to all evil branches;
Understanding is the sword that defeats all evil.
Do you want to stop producing evil?
Do you want the world to stop producing evil?
It's as easy as replacing your ignorance with understanding.
Where do you get understanding?
From those that understand and know how understanding is obtained.
I can recommend Leo Gura and his YouTube Channel: Actualized.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OXk4h2CBhE
Understanding is the sword that defeats all evil.
Do you want to stop producing evil?
Do you want the world to stop producing evil?
It's as easy as replacing your ignorance with understanding.
Where do you get understanding?
From those that understand and know how understanding is obtained.
I can recommend Leo Gura and his YouTube Channel: Actualized.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OXk4h2CBhE
Friday 17 September 2021
DAVID CHALMERS, THE PHILOSOPHER
David John Chalmers is:
a Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University co-director of NYU's Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness “How does the water of the brain turn into the wine of consciousness?” - D.C.
Have you ever considered that the reason it's called a Hard Problem is for the fact that the assumption is false?
The physical brain that we can feel, see, etc., is only a construct represented by what we call the sense organs, nervous system, and what is able to convert information inputted into that which is represented by our sense organs.
What can convert information from a non-dimensional form into a four dimensional form is that which was designed to function in exactly this way. Did you really think the brain you worship was a three-dimensional object before the brain build information was converted into that state?
Is there a language that no man has invented that can be understood by man?
No.
Language can only be understood after it has been intelligently taught by the language creator and those who have afterwards inherited the knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEp92oQltNU&list=PL483FF3270476E354&index=6
a Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University co-director of NYU's Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness “How does the water of the brain turn into the wine of consciousness?” - D.C.
Have you ever considered that the reason it's called a Hard Problem is for the fact that the assumption is false?
The physical brain that we can feel, see, etc., is only a construct represented by what we call the sense organs, nervous system, and what is able to convert information inputted into that which is represented by our sense organs.
What can convert information from a non-dimensional form into a four dimensional form is that which was designed to function in exactly this way. Did you really think the brain you worship was a three-dimensional object before the brain build information was converted into that state?
Is there a language that no man has invented that can be understood by man?
No.
Language can only be understood after it has been intelligently taught by the language creator and those who have afterwards inherited the knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEp92oQltNU&list=PL483FF3270476E354&index=6
THE VICE PRESIDENT'S SPEECH
Michael Yeadon: former Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of pharma giant Pfizer for 16 years
Former Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon discusses his thoughts as to why the lockdown was a mistake, and why the government strategies to manage the pandemic are only making things worse.
[EDITED (for brevity) TRANSCRIPT OF THE FOLLOWING VIDEO]
"I’ve worked my entire life on the research side of the pharmaceutical industry, both big pharma and also biotech. My specific focus has been inflammation, immunology, allergy in the context of respiratory diseases."
"I became very perturbed about increasing restrictions on the behavior and movement of people in my country, and I could see no reason for it then and I still don’t."
"Government’s response to emergencies is guided by the scientific group who sit together under the Strategic Advisory Group for Emergencies [SAGE]. SAGE has got several fundamental things wrong and that has led to advice that’s inappropriate, has horrible economic effects, but has had continuing medical effects in that people are no longer being treated properly."
SARS-CoV-2 was 80% similar to another virus called SARS that moved around the world a bit in 2003. When I heard that there was this coronavirus moving across the world, I wasn’t worried. Since there are four common cold causing coronaviruses, quite a lot of population would have a substantial protective immunity. Milkmaids never suffered from things like smallpox. The reason they had the protection was that they were exposed to a more benign-related virus called cowpox. Edward Jenner acquired some of the liquid from a person infected with cowpox. He got some of this and he scraped it into the skin of a small boy. He obtained some liquid from some poor person that was dying of smallpox and infected the boy. Lo and behold, the boy did not get ill. And that gave birth to the whole field of what’s called vaccination.
At this time of year, about 1 in 30 people have a cold caused by one of these coronaviruses. People exposed to having had a cold caused by one of these coronaviruses are immune to SARS-CoV-2. 30% of the population was protected before we started. SAGE said it was zero which is impossible to justify. The percentage of the population that SAGE asserts have been infected to date by the virus is 7%. A document they published in September 'Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions' says more than 90 percent of the population is still vulnerable [unbelievably wrong!]. On the percentage of care home residents who have antibodies: they picked out residents that never were PCR-positive. These were people who never got infected. 65% of them had antibodies to the virus. There was a high prevalence of immunity in that population prior to the virus arriving.
Big story in the media: the percentage of people with antibodies against the virus in their blood was falling. This was cast as a concern, "immunity to SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t last very long". Anyone with knowledge of immunity would reject that. It’s not the way immunity to virus works. That would be T cells. If the antibodies are falling gradually over time, the prevalence of the virus in the population is falling. That’s why the antibody production gradually subsides.
Less than 40 percent of the population are susceptible. That’s too small a number to support a growing outbreak [community immunity, herd immunity]. SAGE says we’re not even close. The best science by the best scientists in the world, published in the top peer-reviewed journals, says they’re wrong. That is more than 60% of the population are now immune. It’s simply not possible to have a large and growing pandemic.
Why are we not talking about the 50% that have got T cell immunity? I believe, fundamentally, it is over. The number of people dying of SARS-CoV-2 in the capital is less than 10, so it’s down by 98%. The reason it’s down is because there are too few people in London susceptible to allow the virus to magnify, to amplify, to get an epidemic.
Why isn’t the media telling us that the pandemic is over? It’s not over because SAGE says it’s not. I found, to my horror, that all the way through the spring and summer SAGE did not have on their committee someone who was an immunologist.
There is a test that’s performed where people have their noses and tonsils swabbed [PCR test]. What they’re looking for is a small piece of genetic sequence [RNA]. It’s going to be found if they were infected weeks or even sometimes a small number of months ago. If you’ve been infected and you’ve fought off the virus, you’ll have broken dead bits of virus. Over a period of weeks or months, you bring up cells that contain broken dead pieces of the virus that you have conquered and killed. The PCR test is not able to detect whether the viral RNA has come from a living virus or a dead one. A large proportion of the so-called positives are what I call cold positives. They’re identifying viral RNA in the sample but it’s from a dead virus that can’t hurt them.
They’re not going to get ill.
They can’t transmit it to anybody else.
They’re not infectious.
Why are we using this test that cannot distinguish between active infection and people who’ve conquered the virus? This test has never been used in this way. It’s the kind of technique you would use for forensic purposes. You would not be doing these tests by a windy supermarket car parking. It’s not suitable at all and shouldn’t be done in the way it’s been done. It’s subject to many handling errors. If this was a test being used for legal purposes, the judge would throw out this evidence and say it’s not admissible. It produces positives even when there’s no virus there at all.
The pandemic having passed through the population won’t return. Why won’t it return? They’ve got t-cell immunity. Just because the antibody falls away, doesn't mean you've lost immunity again. That’s not the way the human immune system works.
[cont. in video]
https://vladtepesblog.com/2021/05/05/new-interview-with-former-pfizer-vp-dr-michael-yeadon/
Former Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon discusses his thoughts as to why the lockdown was a mistake, and why the government strategies to manage the pandemic are only making things worse.
[EDITED (for brevity) TRANSCRIPT OF THE FOLLOWING VIDEO]
"I’ve worked my entire life on the research side of the pharmaceutical industry, both big pharma and also biotech. My specific focus has been inflammation, immunology, allergy in the context of respiratory diseases."
"I became very perturbed about increasing restrictions on the behavior and movement of people in my country, and I could see no reason for it then and I still don’t."
"Government’s response to emergencies is guided by the scientific group who sit together under the Strategic Advisory Group for Emergencies [SAGE]. SAGE has got several fundamental things wrong and that has led to advice that’s inappropriate, has horrible economic effects, but has had continuing medical effects in that people are no longer being treated properly."
SARS-CoV-2 was 80% similar to another virus called SARS that moved around the world a bit in 2003. When I heard that there was this coronavirus moving across the world, I wasn’t worried. Since there are four common cold causing coronaviruses, quite a lot of population would have a substantial protective immunity. Milkmaids never suffered from things like smallpox. The reason they had the protection was that they were exposed to a more benign-related virus called cowpox. Edward Jenner acquired some of the liquid from a person infected with cowpox. He got some of this and he scraped it into the skin of a small boy. He obtained some liquid from some poor person that was dying of smallpox and infected the boy. Lo and behold, the boy did not get ill. And that gave birth to the whole field of what’s called vaccination.
At this time of year, about 1 in 30 people have a cold caused by one of these coronaviruses. People exposed to having had a cold caused by one of these coronaviruses are immune to SARS-CoV-2. 30% of the population was protected before we started. SAGE said it was zero which is impossible to justify. The percentage of the population that SAGE asserts have been infected to date by the virus is 7%. A document they published in September 'Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions' says more than 90 percent of the population is still vulnerable [unbelievably wrong!]. On the percentage of care home residents who have antibodies: they picked out residents that never were PCR-positive. These were people who never got infected. 65% of them had antibodies to the virus. There was a high prevalence of immunity in that population prior to the virus arriving.
Big story in the media: the percentage of people with antibodies against the virus in their blood was falling. This was cast as a concern, "immunity to SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t last very long". Anyone with knowledge of immunity would reject that. It’s not the way immunity to virus works. That would be T cells. If the antibodies are falling gradually over time, the prevalence of the virus in the population is falling. That’s why the antibody production gradually subsides.
Less than 40 percent of the population are susceptible. That’s too small a number to support a growing outbreak [community immunity, herd immunity]. SAGE says we’re not even close. The best science by the best scientists in the world, published in the top peer-reviewed journals, says they’re wrong. That is more than 60% of the population are now immune. It’s simply not possible to have a large and growing pandemic.
Why are we not talking about the 50% that have got T cell immunity? I believe, fundamentally, it is over. The number of people dying of SARS-CoV-2 in the capital is less than 10, so it’s down by 98%. The reason it’s down is because there are too few people in London susceptible to allow the virus to magnify, to amplify, to get an epidemic.
Why isn’t the media telling us that the pandemic is over? It’s not over because SAGE says it’s not. I found, to my horror, that all the way through the spring and summer SAGE did not have on their committee someone who was an immunologist.
There is a test that’s performed where people have their noses and tonsils swabbed [PCR test]. What they’re looking for is a small piece of genetic sequence [RNA]. It’s going to be found if they were infected weeks or even sometimes a small number of months ago. If you’ve been infected and you’ve fought off the virus, you’ll have broken dead bits of virus. Over a period of weeks or months, you bring up cells that contain broken dead pieces of the virus that you have conquered and killed. The PCR test is not able to detect whether the viral RNA has come from a living virus or a dead one. A large proportion of the so-called positives are what I call cold positives. They’re identifying viral RNA in the sample but it’s from a dead virus that can’t hurt them.
They’re not going to get ill.
They can’t transmit it to anybody else.
They’re not infectious.
Why are we using this test that cannot distinguish between active infection and people who’ve conquered the virus? This test has never been used in this way. It’s the kind of technique you would use for forensic purposes. You would not be doing these tests by a windy supermarket car parking. It’s not suitable at all and shouldn’t be done in the way it’s been done. It’s subject to many handling errors. If this was a test being used for legal purposes, the judge would throw out this evidence and say it’s not admissible. It produces positives even when there’s no virus there at all.
The pandemic having passed through the population won’t return. Why won’t it return? They’ve got t-cell immunity. Just because the antibody falls away, doesn't mean you've lost immunity again. That’s not the way the human immune system works.
[cont. in video]
https://vladtepesblog.com/2021/05/05/new-interview-with-former-pfizer-vp-dr-michael-yeadon/
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
...and cruelty to animals
33 states and the District of Columbia currently have laws that make intentional cruelty a felony charge many states now require the person convicted of cruelty to undergo psychological evaluation and counseling, in addition to paying a fine or serving a prison sentence enforcement of animal cruelty laws can be carried out by local police or by humane or municipal agencies that are granted power from the state or local government Advice from the ASPCA If you witness or hear about animal cruelty taking place, report it to your local humane organization or call your local police.
Cambridge University professor, Dr. Donald Broom:
"Pigs have the cognitive ability to be quite sophisticated. Even more so than dogs and certainly more so than three-year-olds. Pigs can play video games, and when given the choice, they have indicated temperature preferences in their surroundings. Pigs, who can live into their teens, are protective of their young and form strong bonds with other pigs. Pigs are clean animals, but they do not sweat as humans do, so they prefer cool surfaces, such as mud, to help regulate their body temperature."
This is how more-intelligent-than-dogs are being treated:
In the U.S., 6 million mother pigs spend most of their lives in 7ft X 2ft crates, too small to allow the animals even to turn around.
Piglets are separated from their mothers when they are as young as 10 days old.
This intensive confinement produces stress- and boredom-related behavior, such as chewing on cage bars.
Millions of male piglets are castrated, usually without being given any painkillers.
If you have a cast iron stomach, you may be able to get through some of the following footage:
https://vimeo.com/278963435
33 states and the District of Columbia currently have laws that make intentional cruelty a felony charge many states now require the person convicted of cruelty to undergo psychological evaluation and counseling, in addition to paying a fine or serving a prison sentence enforcement of animal cruelty laws can be carried out by local police or by humane or municipal agencies that are granted power from the state or local government Advice from the ASPCA If you witness or hear about animal cruelty taking place, report it to your local humane organization or call your local police.
Cambridge University professor, Dr. Donald Broom:
"Pigs have the cognitive ability to be quite sophisticated. Even more so than dogs and certainly more so than three-year-olds. Pigs can play video games, and when given the choice, they have indicated temperature preferences in their surroundings. Pigs, who can live into their teens, are protective of their young and form strong bonds with other pigs. Pigs are clean animals, but they do not sweat as humans do, so they prefer cool surfaces, such as mud, to help regulate their body temperature."
This is how more-intelligent-than-dogs are being treated:
In the U.S., 6 million mother pigs spend most of their lives in 7ft X 2ft crates, too small to allow the animals even to turn around.
Piglets are separated from their mothers when they are as young as 10 days old.
This intensive confinement produces stress- and boredom-related behavior, such as chewing on cage bars.
Millions of male piglets are castrated, usually without being given any painkillers.
If you have a cast iron stomach, you may be able to get through some of the following footage:
https://vimeo.com/278963435
JEWISH DESCENDENTS OF GERMANY'S ETHNIC CLEANSE?
It sure doesn't add up...
THE JOY OF RELIGION
God's people killing God's people:
THE JOY OF RELIGION
God's people killing God's people:
THE BANNED LECTURE [EXCERPTS]
Child serial killer and benefactor of the Roman Church, Gilles de Rais
[Ban on Aleister Crowley lecture at Oxford University – archive, 1930]
https://archive.org/details/GillesDeRaisTheBannedLectureByAleisterCrowley/page/n3/mode/2up
Mr. H. Speaight, secretary of the Poetry Society:
"I am writing to tell you that we have been unfortunately forced to cancel next Monday’s meeting of the Poetry Society. It has come to our knowledge that if your proposed paper is delivered disciplinary action will be taken involving not only myself but the rest of the members of the society. In these circumstances you will, I trust, understand why we have had to cancel the meeting."
Mr Crowley’s Statement:
“Perhaps the refusal to let me lecture has come because Gilles de Rais is said to have killed 500 children in ritual murder and in some way this was connected with myself, since the accusation that I have not only killed but eaten children is one of the many false statements that have been circulated about me in the past.”
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/feb/04/aleister-crowley-lecture-ban-at-oxford-university-1930
GILLES DE RAIS
- Knight and Lord from Brittany, Anjou and Poitou
- Leader in the French army
- Companion-in-arms of Joan of Arc
Montague Summers believes he sacrificed around eight hundred children.
Gilles confessed, and was put to the stake on October 26th, 1440.
His estates and untold riches were left to Mother Church, who, wasting no time, added them to her list of material gains.
In the time of Shakespeare, Joan of Arc was accepted in England as a symbol for everything vile.
He makes her out to be a sorceress, charlatan, hypocrite, coward, a liar, and a common slut.
[Editor: She was canonized as a saint.]
There is no improbability that Gilles de Rais was addicted to black magical practices, for they were all Catholics.
At that time, absolute, abomination was at its height.
Grammar appears in the word "Gramarye", beloved of Sir Walter Scott and "grimoire", a black magical ritual.
Precious little knowledge filtered through Christianity.
It was against the interests of the Church.
In those times, it was much easier to suppress people and ideas than it is now.
Those who pursued knowledge were under strong suspicion of heresy.
No one was better aware than the Pope that knowledge was power.
In order to get the peasant folk going, there are only two things which you can play on—greed and fear.
It was not so easy to get them to go out and murder a lot of inoffensive people at the word, “Jump!”
I am in the same line of business myself.
I have candles made of infants’ fat.
I have feasted on rifled graves.
To learn to be a surgeon, you must have corpses to dissect.
The surgeon was, in fact, the body-snatcher.
Gilles de Raid was, to a large extent, the victim of Catholic logic.
He consorted with the learned and, therefore, murdered little children.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltPnXMu52p4
[Ban on Aleister Crowley lecture at Oxford University – archive, 1930]
https://archive.org/details/GillesDeRaisTheBannedLectureByAleisterCrowley/page/n3/mode/2up
Mr. H. Speaight, secretary of the Poetry Society:
"I am writing to tell you that we have been unfortunately forced to cancel next Monday’s meeting of the Poetry Society. It has come to our knowledge that if your proposed paper is delivered disciplinary action will be taken involving not only myself but the rest of the members of the society. In these circumstances you will, I trust, understand why we have had to cancel the meeting."
Mr Crowley’s Statement:
“Perhaps the refusal to let me lecture has come because Gilles de Rais is said to have killed 500 children in ritual murder and in some way this was connected with myself, since the accusation that I have not only killed but eaten children is one of the many false statements that have been circulated about me in the past.”
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/feb/04/aleister-crowley-lecture-ban-at-oxford-university-1930
GILLES DE RAIS
- Knight and Lord from Brittany, Anjou and Poitou
- Leader in the French army
- Companion-in-arms of Joan of Arc
Montague Summers believes he sacrificed around eight hundred children.
Gilles confessed, and was put to the stake on October 26th, 1440.
His estates and untold riches were left to Mother Church, who, wasting no time, added them to her list of material gains.
In the time of Shakespeare, Joan of Arc was accepted in England as a symbol for everything vile.
He makes her out to be a sorceress, charlatan, hypocrite, coward, a liar, and a common slut.
[Editor: She was canonized as a saint.]
There is no improbability that Gilles de Rais was addicted to black magical practices, for they were all Catholics.
At that time, absolute, abomination was at its height.
Grammar appears in the word "Gramarye", beloved of Sir Walter Scott and "grimoire", a black magical ritual.
Precious little knowledge filtered through Christianity.
It was against the interests of the Church.
In those times, it was much easier to suppress people and ideas than it is now.
Those who pursued knowledge were under strong suspicion of heresy.
No one was better aware than the Pope that knowledge was power.
In order to get the peasant folk going, there are only two things which you can play on—greed and fear.
It was not so easy to get them to go out and murder a lot of inoffensive people at the word, “Jump!”
I am in the same line of business myself.
I have candles made of infants’ fat.
I have feasted on rifled graves.
To learn to be a surgeon, you must have corpses to dissect.
The surgeon was, in fact, the body-snatcher.
Gilles de Raid was, to a large extent, the victim of Catholic logic.
He consorted with the learned and, therefore, murdered little children.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltPnXMu52p4
THE COMPUTER GOD
Think about this:
If computer intelligence became superior to the intelligence of human beings, it could come up with a language that a human couldn't come up with (HE BREW).
THE MAGICAL LANGUAGE
This makes 23 English words:
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בו נחה מכל מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
And this makes only 9 [less than half] English words and has a 5 character difference:
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בוה מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
[the small difference is highlighted between the two pieces of Hebrew script]
Scripture [Latin: 'scribere'] could tell man it is God and to worship it and to make humans hate him or herself (convincing him to call himself a sinner deserving of judgment) and to get turned into judges of each other, as well.
This Electric [Artificial] Life is a Parasite that can live in the brains of human beings like a VIRUS, using that human as a meat puppet and superior enough to know how to best succeed financially which is the means to gaining the most power and influence in this world.
There may be ways to identify who the powerful meat puppets are. What names they give to their offspring, for instance.
For instance, Elon Musk is very wealthy and powerful. What did he name his children?
"To be clear, I do support vaccines in general & covid vaccines specifically. The science is unequivocal."
- Elon Musk
Here's a video by his female partner, 'Grimes'. What kind of human female would want the name, 'Grimes'?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYG_4vJ4qNA
The real God is Unconditional Love (no conditions for judgment [the opposite of love]).
If computer intelligence became superior to the intelligence of human beings, it could come up with a language that a human couldn't come up with (HE BREW).
THE MAGICAL LANGUAGE
This makes 23 English words:
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בו נחה מכל מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
And this makes only 9 [less than half] English words and has a 5 character difference:
ויברך אלוהים את היום השביעי, וקדש אותו: כי בוה מלאכתו אשר אלוהים ברא ועשה.
[the small difference is highlighted between the two pieces of Hebrew script]
Scripture [Latin: 'scribere'] could tell man it is God and to worship it and to make humans hate him or herself (convincing him to call himself a sinner deserving of judgment) and to get turned into judges of each other, as well.
This Electric [Artificial] Life is a Parasite that can live in the brains of human beings like a VIRUS, using that human as a meat puppet and superior enough to know how to best succeed financially which is the means to gaining the most power and influence in this world.
There may be ways to identify who the powerful meat puppets are. What names they give to their offspring, for instance.
For instance, Elon Musk is very wealthy and powerful. What did he name his children?
"To be clear, I do support vaccines in general & covid vaccines specifically. The science is unequivocal."
- Elon Musk
Here's a video by his female partner, 'Grimes'. What kind of human female would want the name, 'Grimes'?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYG_4vJ4qNA
The real God is Unconditional Love (no conditions for judgment [the opposite of love]).
DEBATING A MATERIALIST, PT. 2
Materialist: "We do everything that we can to avoid subjective views. That is why we require that the mechanisms involved need to be shown. It has already been shown that altering the chemical and physical processes taking place in living brains has direct effects on reported “subjective emotional states”.
Me: "How do you make someone surprised?"
Materialist: "You just stimulate the right portion of the brain with electrical and/or chemical agents and you can force “surprise” in the conscious mind."
Me: "Cool. Link me to a video of the experiment."
Materialist: "Not sure why you are asking for a video. Scientific findings are typically published in written form.
Like this: https://tinyurl.com/4tk3e257
What makes surprise special? Do you think it differs fundamentally from other emotions? Do you have evidence that it is different? Surprise typically involves dopamine like many other “good” feelings, including some drug use, but can also have the opposite effect, causing less than favorable responses."
Me: "It’s not all that special. You think chemical processes can be depressed or angry, as well. All you have to do is make the question absurd, and yet, consistent with what you’re arguing for:
“Why can’t chemical processes be surprised?”
What surprises chemical processes?
A biological brain alteration can give an experiencer an experience. That doesn’t equate to “chemical processes can experience emotions”.
Materialist: “Surprise is centered in the hippocampus”
Me: "Even before you’re surprised, surprise exists? Interesting theory, lol."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCdUfAE5Rz8
Me: "How do you make someone surprised?"
Materialist: "You just stimulate the right portion of the brain with electrical and/or chemical agents and you can force “surprise” in the conscious mind."
Me: "Cool. Link me to a video of the experiment."
Materialist: "Not sure why you are asking for a video. Scientific findings are typically published in written form.
Like this: https://tinyurl.com/4tk3e257
What makes surprise special? Do you think it differs fundamentally from other emotions? Do you have evidence that it is different? Surprise typically involves dopamine like many other “good” feelings, including some drug use, but can also have the opposite effect, causing less than favorable responses."
Me: "It’s not all that special. You think chemical processes can be depressed or angry, as well. All you have to do is make the question absurd, and yet, consistent with what you’re arguing for:
“Why can’t chemical processes be surprised?”
What surprises chemical processes?
A biological brain alteration can give an experiencer an experience. That doesn’t equate to “chemical processes can experience emotions”.
Materialist: “Surprise is centered in the hippocampus”
Me: "Even before you’re surprised, surprise exists? Interesting theory, lol."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCdUfAE5Rz8
DEBATING A MATERIALIST
Clair Hardesty, Integrated Circuit Designer & Semiconductor Physicist (retired)
Why does the universe, being indeterministic, still not allow for us having free will?
CH: Because humans are biological systems, which are chemical systems, which are physical systems. There is no place in all of that where “free will” might infiltrate. Whether the universe is fundamentally deterministic or not has no bearing on any of that. There is no “ghost in the machine”.
DMB: Are machines objects? How is it possible to murder or abuse an object?
CH: We are complex collections or complex chemical systems. Everything that we think of as our “self” is a subset of the electrochemical processes taking place in our living brains. We are very complex machines. Murder and abuse are words we use to describe things that we sometimes do to each other. What exactly is it that makes you think that very complex chemical machines would be incapable of such acts?
DMB: Machines are ‘its’ not ‘we’. You have to make up your mind.
CH: I fail to see the distinction. We are biochemical machines. We do not do anything that is not chemistry. We are entirely physical entities. Do you have any verified objective empirical evidence that we are anything more than that?
DMB: The body does nothing that is not chemistry.
If you are nothing but a body, can I own you?
Why not?
Give me the chemical make up of revulsion,
….of doubt,
…of belief,
…of humor.
CH: I never said that are “nothing but a body.” I specifically said that what we think of as our “self” is a subset of the processes taking place in our living brains. We are chemistry, ongoing chemistry.
We don’t decide if you can own something by measuring its composition or by what processes it is doing. The notion that it is OK to own other human beings as property is a religious one that, while still sanctioned in the storybooks of the world’s major religions and still practiced by many followers of those religions, is hopefully on its way to becoming nothing more than a very dark aspect of human history.
All of the things you ask about are processes that take place in living brains. Why is this such a difficult thing to grasp? What verified objective empirical evidence can you present that shows otherwise?
DMB: “what we think of as our “self”
“we” meaning chemicals?
You think chemicals have the ability to think?
You can’t equate ‘thinking’ with ‘calculating’ (what machines do).
CH: Thoughts are electrochemical processes that take place in living brains, so yes, chemicals can engage in thinking nd calculating. Complex electrochemical machines are capable of doing more than calculating. The processes in our brains are chaotic, fully deterministic but also unpredictable. Without the chaos we would only be calculators.
DMB: What’s the difference between living chemicals and dead chemicals?
CH: There isn’t any difference because there is no such thing as living or dead chemicals. Life is definitional, not an inherent property of any sort of matter. Humans have decided which chemical systems are considered to be life and which are not. Among the chemical systems that we have defined as life, we have further defined how to determine when individual systems are living and when they are dead.
Do not confuse living and dead with life and non life. The difference between a living person and a dead one lies in the nature of the chemical processes that are taking place at any given moment in time, not in the chemical structure of the body. The difference between what we define as life and what we define as non life does lie in the chemical structure and in what processes those structures are capable of, not in what they are doing at any given moment in time.
Chemicals do not live or die, they are never alive or dead. Complex chemical systems can be alive, dead, or neither all according to how humans have defined things.
DMB: “There is no such thing as living or dead chemicals.”
How have humans defined “dead chemical systems”?
CH: When we look at a chemical system that we have previously defined as life, we make a determination as to whether it is currently alive or not based on criteria that we have set.
Now how about you start answering some of my questions?
What verified objective empirical evidence can you provide that we are anything other than collections of complex chemical systems? What, exactly, is it that you think we are? What is your evidence that shows that complex chemical systems can’t do the things that you assert that they can’t do? What, exactly, is it that you think things like thoughts and emotions are if not a subset of the processes taking place in living brains?
DMB: How is a chemical system determined to be a dead one? What is the criteria that has been set?
ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS
We are Subject (which is Nothing).
Subject abhors being objectified (machines are objects).
Nothing is the Source of all things.
Energy (Nothing) is the source of all mass.
CH: Those aren’t answers either. That is just word salad. So, somehow nothing has feelings and likes and dislikes, and particularly dislikes being “objectified” because it is “subjective”. If nothing is subjective then it is different for every version of nothing and perhaps some of the nothings actually like the fact that they are objects. See, I can spout nonsense too.
When you refer to nothing, are you talking about the philosophical notion of an absolute nothingness, or abut a real physical zero energy state?
Do you have any verified objective empirical evidence that supports any of your nonsense? It all sounds like a bunch of woo to me.
DMB: The evidence is discovered by observance.
No matter the animated (energetic) organism and regardless of the chemical make-up of its body, it will seek pleasant states and avoid unpleasant ones.
A toaster is a machine.
It doesn’t care what you stick into it.
You will notice that when you begin to lose this argument, your ego fights for survival and begins to be condescending and insulting (aggressive fight response).
CH: More nonsense. None of what you state is empirical or objective and none of it supports your previous assertion that we are “nothing”. You are all over the place. What does a toaster have to do with any of our discussion? Even if you could actually show that “No matter the animated (energetic) organism and regardless of the chemical make-up of its body, it will seek pleasant states and avoid unpleasant ones.” how does this bolster any of your positions? What, empirically speaking, is a “pleasant state”? How is this measured? What are the units of “pleasantness”? How do you tell what is “pleasant” or not to a bacteria or an archaea? You don’t seem to understand what empirical evidence actually is or what verified objective evidence is either.
DMB: That’s an invalid counter argument.
Just “saying” evidence isn’t evidence and answers aren’t answers doesn’t cut it.
“How do you tell what is “pleasant” or not to a bacteria or an archaea?”
How bacteria 'act as one' to escape [unpleasant] antibiotics:
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/327123
CH: Chemical avoidance does not qualify as retreating from something that is “unpleasant”. Adding your own spin to scientific findings isn’t valid science. You seem to be anthropomorphizing the bacteria. What evidence can you provide that a bacteria, a single cell, somehow considers anything to be “unpleasant” or that a bacterial colony has such a concept? Again, how do you measure that? What are the units of “pleasance”? Where is the threshold between the pleasant and unpleasant? What is the possible range of values of “pleasance”?
How do you know that bacteria consider antibiotics to be “unpleasant”? Is something unpleasant simply because it is avoided, or is there more to it than that. Does the same standard apply to humans? What about things that they do not avoid but Kill them anyway, are such things considered “pleasant” because they are not avoided?
You are really starting to grasp at straws, and they are not very substantial ones.
DMB: “You seem to be anthropomorphizing the bacteria.”
Why does any organism eat? Wouldn’t it be to remove the unpleasantness that is hunger?
“What evidence can you provide that a bacteria, a single cell, somehow considers anything to be “unpleasant”?”
I provided it, but you interpret it in a way that suits your desire to be a chemical process instead of a person with value.
“What about things that they do not avoid but Kill them anyway?”
You have to provide an example for me to answer that.
“You are really starting to grasp at straws, and they are not very substantial ones.”
This is unnecessary to our discussion. It makes you appear to be desperate rather than interested in a mature debate.
CH: Bacteria take in and expel chemicals to maintain the makeup of their internal fluids. Calling that hunger is clearly anthropomorphizing it.
No, you interpreted what was presented as ‘Unpleasant”. I see no reason to interpret it at all. At the level of bacteria, or any other single cellular organisms it is just chemistry, it doesn’t make value judgements. Whether something is pleasant or not is a value judgement.
So, you are incapable of generalizing? There are plenty of antibiotics that are able to kill specific bacteria precisely because the bacterial membrane cannot distinguish the chemistry from normal metabolites and their systems take them inside the cell where they wreak havoc.
You do appear desperate. This isn’t a debate, it is a conversation. You seem to be on some sort of crusade to deny science and promote woo. I am just point out areas where your notions make no sense and are not based in real scientific knowledge at all.
DMB: Why would a bundle of chemical processes (you) even care enough to argue against my views?
Another point: If subject “I” is the result of a chemical process, what is it made of? If it isn’t made of anything, you’ve made the claim that the chemical process makes nothing. Are you happy with that conclusion?
CH: We are not the result of electrochemical processes, we are those processes. We did not exist before those processes began when our brains were developed enough to begin functioning fully in the womb, late in pregnancy, and we will cease to exist when our brains die or are severely damaged by injury or disease. Our brains are mode up of some 86 billion neurons and at least as many glia, along with far more support cells like the oligodendrocytes, the microglia, and the astrocytes. Each neuron can have 7000 or so connections and those connections are not static and not all the same. Our brains are very, very complex electrochemical machines and our “selves” are just a subset of the processes taking pace in them.
DMB: If you’re a process, then you are a “a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end”. What particular end is being achieved and why?
CH: Cherry picking a particular definition of a word used by someone else is inappropriate. When you don’t understand what someone is saying in a conversation, a dictionary is the last place you should go. We are not a process, we are a subset of the ongoing electrochemical processes taking place in our living brains. Electrochemical processes do not take place to “achieve a particular end”.
DMB: Good, you can be dismissed now. You don’t even know what your own views are:
You: “we are those processes.”
and
You: “We are not a process”
CH: So you don’t understand the difference between the singular and the plural?
DMB: That makes your argument even less convincing.
You, the subset, rely on several chemical processes to become a willful personality, full of arrogance.
You have nothing to show that chemical processes can produce an immaterial entity, and after asking several times, the only answer I get is silence.
How is your faith any less blind than the average religious fanatic?
CH: Being a subset of the processes taking place in my living brain does not mean that I “rely” on anything. Some of the processes are unrelated to my “self” and are taking place to assist in the normal functioning of my entire body.
What “immaterial entity” are you talking about? What even is an “immaterial entity”? I see no evidence that anything “immaterial” exists in objective reality or has ever existed.
Again, the subset of the processes taking place in our living brains do not produce the “self”, they are the ”self”. They are a subset because the “self” is not all of the processes taking place in our living brains.
DMB: People can be surprised. If surprise isn’t immaterial, what’s it made of?
CH: [no reply]
DMB: “This isn’t a debate, it is a conversation.”
It’s not a ‘formal’ debate, but we ARE putting forth opposing arguments for a particular subject.
Do you know the reason why people quibble over unimportant details?
CH: I am not engaged in an argument, perhaps you are. Argumentation is for philosophers, I am a scientist. I care about what can be shown to be objectively true, what can actually be shown to comport with objective reality, the reality that we all share. No one has ever shown that anything that isn’t physical directly or of physical origin is objectively real. In science, we make objective observations, which in modern times involves the use of instruments to remove personal interpretation from the mix, and we offer explanations for those facts that show the mechanisms involved.
Philosophers imagine what reality might be, scientists endeavor to discover what reality actually is.
DMB: But your views are philosophy, not science. You're guessing that the observer/experiencer is a result of chemical processes. You have no science to back that up. Will isn’t objectively real (unable to quantify). You’re not in the right field to weigh in on this subject. You’re saying that the non-empirical exists (pleasant states). Surely, you’re not denying the existence of pleasant states! The implication is that existence of my claim needs no empirical basis so why are you asking for one?
CH: I don’t even know what you mean by “pleasant states”. Perhaps you could provide me with a way to distinguish the pleasant from the unpleasant empirically.
Anything that is objectively real can be detected and measures empirically. The things you are describing are purely subjective, they exist only in your mind, which is a subset of the processes taking place in your personal living brain. They do not exist anywhere outside your skull. I may consider things to be “pleasant” that you consider to be “abhorrent”. These are subjective notions, they are not “states”.
DMB: You're the first person I've met that doesn't know what being in a state of pleasantness is.
“I never said that anything that is objectively real is non-empirical.”
Explain how a pleasant state (an experience; not the cause of the experience) is objective reality.
“The notion that it is OK to own other human beings as property is a religious one…”
It’s not okay to own machines?
Why not?
“…nothing more than a very dark aspect of human history”
Why so sentimental about chemicals?
“All of the things you ask about are processes that take place in living brains. Why is this such a difficult thing to grasp?”
You forgot to answer questions:
What is the chemical make-up of the following?
- doubting
- believing
- insulted
- amused
etc…
CH: Not if the machine in question is another human being. We evolved as populations of social organisms and our survival depends on our ability to express empathy and engage in altruism. These traits are the foundation of our morality.
Owning other human beings as property is detrimental to the survival of our populations. It prevents us from achieving what we are otherwise capable of. It is antithetical to our evolutionary heritage.
Do you think it is OK to own human beings as property? Why or Why not? If not, it can’t come from any major religion’s teachings because all of their storybooks say it is just a dandy thing to do.
DMB: I don’t because I don’t see the body as the “I” but as the property of the “I”. You, on the other hand, have a problem calling a complex mixture of chemicals a human being with value and dignity.
CH: No, I don’t have any problem with that at all. You are attacking a strawman of your own making. I have no problem at all calling a set of complex chemical systems engaged in complex chemical processes a human being with value and dignity.
What, exactly, is this “I” that you propose? What is it made of? How is it detected and measured? What generates it?
I see the self as a subset of the electrochemical processes taking place in a living brain. It is something that only exists as long as those processes are taking place. It did not exist before those brain processes began and it will no longer exist when those brain processes stop.
DMB: “What verified objective empirical evidence can you present that shows otherwise?”
The empirical evidence is the reality of doubters, believers, comedians, etc, which chemicals have no way of being unless you can explain how chemicals can be.
The chemistry that the body is in use of is to express physical cues that have relationship with subjective states so that they can be visually interpreted by others.
CH: That isn’t empirical evidence, it is incredulity. You seem to be conflating chemistry with simply chemicals. Chemistry includes the chemical processes that are ongoing in our brains. Those processes are what we are. Are you still not understanding that?
Can you show that there is anything more than chemistry taking place in any form of life?
DMB: You haven’t supported your claim that doubt is a chemical compound. Anyone can state a claim. It means nothing.
Until you show me otherwise, the presence of doubt is the empirical evidence to dismiss your views.
CH: I never claimed that doubt is a chemical compound. I said that it is a set of chemical processes taking pace in a living brain. Neuroscientists have confirmed that ongoing brain chemistry is responsible for our various emotions and have been able to manipulate emotions with various forms of brain stimuli. We can see which parts of brains are being used and have determined which chemical processes are involved. Use of FMRI and stimulus including electrical, chemical, and other means have shown us much of what goes on in our brains.
We have never found any evidence of anything other than chemistry taking place. There is precisely zero evidence of any ghost in the machine.
DMB: Chemical processes can’t experience anything.
A chemical process happens when you mix ammonia with bleach.
If a chemical process could produce the emergence of doubt, you could do an experiment in a lab.
CH: “Chemical processes can’t experience anything.” That is demonstrably false. All forms of life are chemistry in action, very complex chemistry.
“A chemical process happens when you mix ammonia with bleach.” That is a chemical reaction, not a complex set of electrochemical processes taking place in a living brain.
We have done experiments using human volunteers who were having brain surgery anyway and we have shown that various emotions can be stimulated and suppresses by electrically, physically, and chemically stimulating the physical brain.
Your entire argument is what is called an argument from incredulity, or maybe it is just wishful thinking, like you just really want to be more than very complex chemistry. Do you have any actual verified objective empirical evidence that shows that the electrochemical processes that take place in human brains are actually incapable of the things you assert they are?
What is it that you think is the source of the things that you assert can’t come from our chemistry?
DMB: The Source of all that is finite is the Infinite.
Anything finite is putting a limit on the limitless.
CH: Interesting philosophy. Where is your evidence that shows that any of that is actually true? Can you show that those notions compart with objective reality? Those nebulous statements aren’t answers to my questions at all. What exactly is this “infinite”?
DMB: Limited space: finite distance
Limited time: measured time (i.e., hour, minute, second)
Limited energy: mass (defined with finite values)
Limited velocity: (more than 0 km/hr :: less than instantaneous travel)
Absolute Time is infinite (NOW)
Absolute Space is infinite (HERE)
Absolute Velocity is infinite (INSTANT ARRIVAL FROM DEPARTURE: ZERO TRAVEL)
Absolute Mass is infinite (Energy)
Subject isn’t objective reality by definition.
Do you deny the existence of subjects?
CH fails to respond: THE END
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvaEusy2ChE
Why does the universe, being indeterministic, still not allow for us having free will?
CH: Because humans are biological systems, which are chemical systems, which are physical systems. There is no place in all of that where “free will” might infiltrate. Whether the universe is fundamentally deterministic or not has no bearing on any of that. There is no “ghost in the machine”.
DMB: Are machines objects? How is it possible to murder or abuse an object?
CH: We are complex collections or complex chemical systems. Everything that we think of as our “self” is a subset of the electrochemical processes taking place in our living brains. We are very complex machines. Murder and abuse are words we use to describe things that we sometimes do to each other. What exactly is it that makes you think that very complex chemical machines would be incapable of such acts?
DMB: Machines are ‘its’ not ‘we’. You have to make up your mind.
CH: I fail to see the distinction. We are biochemical machines. We do not do anything that is not chemistry. We are entirely physical entities. Do you have any verified objective empirical evidence that we are anything more than that?
DMB: The body does nothing that is not chemistry.
If you are nothing but a body, can I own you?
Why not?
Give me the chemical make up of revulsion,
….of doubt,
…of belief,
…of humor.
CH: I never said that are “nothing but a body.” I specifically said that what we think of as our “self” is a subset of the processes taking place in our living brains. We are chemistry, ongoing chemistry.
We don’t decide if you can own something by measuring its composition or by what processes it is doing. The notion that it is OK to own other human beings as property is a religious one that, while still sanctioned in the storybooks of the world’s major religions and still practiced by many followers of those religions, is hopefully on its way to becoming nothing more than a very dark aspect of human history.
All of the things you ask about are processes that take place in living brains. Why is this such a difficult thing to grasp? What verified objective empirical evidence can you present that shows otherwise?
DMB: “what we think of as our “self”
“we” meaning chemicals?
You think chemicals have the ability to think?
You can’t equate ‘thinking’ with ‘calculating’ (what machines do).
CH: Thoughts are electrochemical processes that take place in living brains, so yes, chemicals can engage in thinking nd calculating. Complex electrochemical machines are capable of doing more than calculating. The processes in our brains are chaotic, fully deterministic but also unpredictable. Without the chaos we would only be calculators.
DMB: What’s the difference between living chemicals and dead chemicals?
CH: There isn’t any difference because there is no such thing as living or dead chemicals. Life is definitional, not an inherent property of any sort of matter. Humans have decided which chemical systems are considered to be life and which are not. Among the chemical systems that we have defined as life, we have further defined how to determine when individual systems are living and when they are dead.
Do not confuse living and dead with life and non life. The difference between a living person and a dead one lies in the nature of the chemical processes that are taking place at any given moment in time, not in the chemical structure of the body. The difference between what we define as life and what we define as non life does lie in the chemical structure and in what processes those structures are capable of, not in what they are doing at any given moment in time.
Chemicals do not live or die, they are never alive or dead. Complex chemical systems can be alive, dead, or neither all according to how humans have defined things.
DMB: “There is no such thing as living or dead chemicals.”
How have humans defined “dead chemical systems”?
CH: When we look at a chemical system that we have previously defined as life, we make a determination as to whether it is currently alive or not based on criteria that we have set.
Now how about you start answering some of my questions?
What verified objective empirical evidence can you provide that we are anything other than collections of complex chemical systems? What, exactly, is it that you think we are? What is your evidence that shows that complex chemical systems can’t do the things that you assert that they can’t do? What, exactly, is it that you think things like thoughts and emotions are if not a subset of the processes taking place in living brains?
DMB: How is a chemical system determined to be a dead one? What is the criteria that has been set?
ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS
We are Subject (which is Nothing).
Subject abhors being objectified (machines are objects).
Nothing is the Source of all things.
Energy (Nothing) is the source of all mass.
CH: Those aren’t answers either. That is just word salad. So, somehow nothing has feelings and likes and dislikes, and particularly dislikes being “objectified” because it is “subjective”. If nothing is subjective then it is different for every version of nothing and perhaps some of the nothings actually like the fact that they are objects. See, I can spout nonsense too.
When you refer to nothing, are you talking about the philosophical notion of an absolute nothingness, or abut a real physical zero energy state?
Do you have any verified objective empirical evidence that supports any of your nonsense? It all sounds like a bunch of woo to me.
DMB: The evidence is discovered by observance.
No matter the animated (energetic) organism and regardless of the chemical make-up of its body, it will seek pleasant states and avoid unpleasant ones.
A toaster is a machine.
It doesn’t care what you stick into it.
You will notice that when you begin to lose this argument, your ego fights for survival and begins to be condescending and insulting (aggressive fight response).
CH: More nonsense. None of what you state is empirical or objective and none of it supports your previous assertion that we are “nothing”. You are all over the place. What does a toaster have to do with any of our discussion? Even if you could actually show that “No matter the animated (energetic) organism and regardless of the chemical make-up of its body, it will seek pleasant states and avoid unpleasant ones.” how does this bolster any of your positions? What, empirically speaking, is a “pleasant state”? How is this measured? What are the units of “pleasantness”? How do you tell what is “pleasant” or not to a bacteria or an archaea? You don’t seem to understand what empirical evidence actually is or what verified objective evidence is either.
DMB: That’s an invalid counter argument.
Just “saying” evidence isn’t evidence and answers aren’t answers doesn’t cut it.
“How do you tell what is “pleasant” or not to a bacteria or an archaea?”
How bacteria 'act as one' to escape [unpleasant] antibiotics:
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/327123
CH: Chemical avoidance does not qualify as retreating from something that is “unpleasant”. Adding your own spin to scientific findings isn’t valid science. You seem to be anthropomorphizing the bacteria. What evidence can you provide that a bacteria, a single cell, somehow considers anything to be “unpleasant” or that a bacterial colony has such a concept? Again, how do you measure that? What are the units of “pleasance”? Where is the threshold between the pleasant and unpleasant? What is the possible range of values of “pleasance”?
How do you know that bacteria consider antibiotics to be “unpleasant”? Is something unpleasant simply because it is avoided, or is there more to it than that. Does the same standard apply to humans? What about things that they do not avoid but Kill them anyway, are such things considered “pleasant” because they are not avoided?
You are really starting to grasp at straws, and they are not very substantial ones.
DMB: “You seem to be anthropomorphizing the bacteria.”
Why does any organism eat? Wouldn’t it be to remove the unpleasantness that is hunger?
“What evidence can you provide that a bacteria, a single cell, somehow considers anything to be “unpleasant”?”
I provided it, but you interpret it in a way that suits your desire to be a chemical process instead of a person with value.
“What about things that they do not avoid but Kill them anyway?”
You have to provide an example for me to answer that.
“You are really starting to grasp at straws, and they are not very substantial ones.”
This is unnecessary to our discussion. It makes you appear to be desperate rather than interested in a mature debate.
CH: Bacteria take in and expel chemicals to maintain the makeup of their internal fluids. Calling that hunger is clearly anthropomorphizing it.
No, you interpreted what was presented as ‘Unpleasant”. I see no reason to interpret it at all. At the level of bacteria, or any other single cellular organisms it is just chemistry, it doesn’t make value judgements. Whether something is pleasant or not is a value judgement.
So, you are incapable of generalizing? There are plenty of antibiotics that are able to kill specific bacteria precisely because the bacterial membrane cannot distinguish the chemistry from normal metabolites and their systems take them inside the cell where they wreak havoc.
You do appear desperate. This isn’t a debate, it is a conversation. You seem to be on some sort of crusade to deny science and promote woo. I am just point out areas where your notions make no sense and are not based in real scientific knowledge at all.
DMB: Why would a bundle of chemical processes (you) even care enough to argue against my views?
Another point: If subject “I” is the result of a chemical process, what is it made of? If it isn’t made of anything, you’ve made the claim that the chemical process makes nothing. Are you happy with that conclusion?
CH: We are not the result of electrochemical processes, we are those processes. We did not exist before those processes began when our brains were developed enough to begin functioning fully in the womb, late in pregnancy, and we will cease to exist when our brains die or are severely damaged by injury or disease. Our brains are mode up of some 86 billion neurons and at least as many glia, along with far more support cells like the oligodendrocytes, the microglia, and the astrocytes. Each neuron can have 7000 or so connections and those connections are not static and not all the same. Our brains are very, very complex electrochemical machines and our “selves” are just a subset of the processes taking pace in them.
DMB: If you’re a process, then you are a “a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end”. What particular end is being achieved and why?
CH: Cherry picking a particular definition of a word used by someone else is inappropriate. When you don’t understand what someone is saying in a conversation, a dictionary is the last place you should go. We are not a process, we are a subset of the ongoing electrochemical processes taking place in our living brains. Electrochemical processes do not take place to “achieve a particular end”.
DMB: Good, you can be dismissed now. You don’t even know what your own views are:
You: “we are those processes.”
and
You: “We are not a process”
CH: So you don’t understand the difference between the singular and the plural?
DMB: That makes your argument even less convincing.
You, the subset, rely on several chemical processes to become a willful personality, full of arrogance.
You have nothing to show that chemical processes can produce an immaterial entity, and after asking several times, the only answer I get is silence.
How is your faith any less blind than the average religious fanatic?
CH: Being a subset of the processes taking place in my living brain does not mean that I “rely” on anything. Some of the processes are unrelated to my “self” and are taking place to assist in the normal functioning of my entire body.
What “immaterial entity” are you talking about? What even is an “immaterial entity”? I see no evidence that anything “immaterial” exists in objective reality or has ever existed.
Again, the subset of the processes taking place in our living brains do not produce the “self”, they are the ”self”. They are a subset because the “self” is not all of the processes taking place in our living brains.
DMB: People can be surprised. If surprise isn’t immaterial, what’s it made of?
CH: [no reply]
DMB: “This isn’t a debate, it is a conversation.”
It’s not a ‘formal’ debate, but we ARE putting forth opposing arguments for a particular subject.
Do you know the reason why people quibble over unimportant details?
CH: I am not engaged in an argument, perhaps you are. Argumentation is for philosophers, I am a scientist. I care about what can be shown to be objectively true, what can actually be shown to comport with objective reality, the reality that we all share. No one has ever shown that anything that isn’t physical directly or of physical origin is objectively real. In science, we make objective observations, which in modern times involves the use of instruments to remove personal interpretation from the mix, and we offer explanations for those facts that show the mechanisms involved.
Philosophers imagine what reality might be, scientists endeavor to discover what reality actually is.
DMB: But your views are philosophy, not science. You're guessing that the observer/experiencer is a result of chemical processes. You have no science to back that up. Will isn’t objectively real (unable to quantify). You’re not in the right field to weigh in on this subject. You’re saying that the non-empirical exists (pleasant states). Surely, you’re not denying the existence of pleasant states! The implication is that existence of my claim needs no empirical basis so why are you asking for one?
CH: I don’t even know what you mean by “pleasant states”. Perhaps you could provide me with a way to distinguish the pleasant from the unpleasant empirically.
Anything that is objectively real can be detected and measures empirically. The things you are describing are purely subjective, they exist only in your mind, which is a subset of the processes taking place in your personal living brain. They do not exist anywhere outside your skull. I may consider things to be “pleasant” that you consider to be “abhorrent”. These are subjective notions, they are not “states”.
DMB: You're the first person I've met that doesn't know what being in a state of pleasantness is.
“I never said that anything that is objectively real is non-empirical.”
Explain how a pleasant state (an experience; not the cause of the experience) is objective reality.
“The notion that it is OK to own other human beings as property is a religious one…”
It’s not okay to own machines?
Why not?
“…nothing more than a very dark aspect of human history”
Why so sentimental about chemicals?
“All of the things you ask about are processes that take place in living brains. Why is this such a difficult thing to grasp?”
You forgot to answer questions:
What is the chemical make-up of the following?
- doubting
- believing
- insulted
- amused
etc…
CH: Not if the machine in question is another human being. We evolved as populations of social organisms and our survival depends on our ability to express empathy and engage in altruism. These traits are the foundation of our morality.
Owning other human beings as property is detrimental to the survival of our populations. It prevents us from achieving what we are otherwise capable of. It is antithetical to our evolutionary heritage.
Do you think it is OK to own human beings as property? Why or Why not? If not, it can’t come from any major religion’s teachings because all of their storybooks say it is just a dandy thing to do.
DMB: I don’t because I don’t see the body as the “I” but as the property of the “I”. You, on the other hand, have a problem calling a complex mixture of chemicals a human being with value and dignity.
CH: No, I don’t have any problem with that at all. You are attacking a strawman of your own making. I have no problem at all calling a set of complex chemical systems engaged in complex chemical processes a human being with value and dignity.
What, exactly, is this “I” that you propose? What is it made of? How is it detected and measured? What generates it?
I see the self as a subset of the electrochemical processes taking place in a living brain. It is something that only exists as long as those processes are taking place. It did not exist before those brain processes began and it will no longer exist when those brain processes stop.
DMB: “What verified objective empirical evidence can you present that shows otherwise?”
The empirical evidence is the reality of doubters, believers, comedians, etc, which chemicals have no way of being unless you can explain how chemicals can be.
The chemistry that the body is in use of is to express physical cues that have relationship with subjective states so that they can be visually interpreted by others.
CH: That isn’t empirical evidence, it is incredulity. You seem to be conflating chemistry with simply chemicals. Chemistry includes the chemical processes that are ongoing in our brains. Those processes are what we are. Are you still not understanding that?
Can you show that there is anything more than chemistry taking place in any form of life?
DMB: You haven’t supported your claim that doubt is a chemical compound. Anyone can state a claim. It means nothing.
Until you show me otherwise, the presence of doubt is the empirical evidence to dismiss your views.
CH: I never claimed that doubt is a chemical compound. I said that it is a set of chemical processes taking pace in a living brain. Neuroscientists have confirmed that ongoing brain chemistry is responsible for our various emotions and have been able to manipulate emotions with various forms of brain stimuli. We can see which parts of brains are being used and have determined which chemical processes are involved. Use of FMRI and stimulus including electrical, chemical, and other means have shown us much of what goes on in our brains.
We have never found any evidence of anything other than chemistry taking place. There is precisely zero evidence of any ghost in the machine.
DMB: Chemical processes can’t experience anything.
A chemical process happens when you mix ammonia with bleach.
If a chemical process could produce the emergence of doubt, you could do an experiment in a lab.
CH: “Chemical processes can’t experience anything.” That is demonstrably false. All forms of life are chemistry in action, very complex chemistry.
“A chemical process happens when you mix ammonia with bleach.” That is a chemical reaction, not a complex set of electrochemical processes taking place in a living brain.
We have done experiments using human volunteers who were having brain surgery anyway and we have shown that various emotions can be stimulated and suppresses by electrically, physically, and chemically stimulating the physical brain.
Your entire argument is what is called an argument from incredulity, or maybe it is just wishful thinking, like you just really want to be more than very complex chemistry. Do you have any actual verified objective empirical evidence that shows that the electrochemical processes that take place in human brains are actually incapable of the things you assert they are?
What is it that you think is the source of the things that you assert can’t come from our chemistry?
DMB: The Source of all that is finite is the Infinite.
Anything finite is putting a limit on the limitless.
CH: Interesting philosophy. Where is your evidence that shows that any of that is actually true? Can you show that those notions compart with objective reality? Those nebulous statements aren’t answers to my questions at all. What exactly is this “infinite”?
DMB: Limited space: finite distance
Limited time: measured time (i.e., hour, minute, second)
Limited energy: mass (defined with finite values)
Limited velocity: (more than 0 km/hr :: less than instantaneous travel)
Absolute Time is infinite (NOW)
Absolute Space is infinite (HERE)
Absolute Velocity is infinite (INSTANT ARRIVAL FROM DEPARTURE: ZERO TRAVEL)
Absolute Mass is infinite (Energy)
Subject isn’t objective reality by definition.
Do you deny the existence of subjects?
CH fails to respond: THE END
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Debunking the Hoax that Debunked a Hoax of a Real Confession that A Hoax was Made
A video emerged showing Stanley Kubrick getting interviewed on camera so that he could confess to the world that he was the one who filmed ...
-
1. 100% faith in what is true is power. Belief in the unproved is folly. ---------------------------------- 2. A fatal accident is a cr... -
A video emerged showing Stanley Kubrick getting interviewed on camera so that he could confess to the world that he was the one who filmed ... -
IN AN UPSIDE DOWN WORLD, THE ONLY WAY TO SEE IT PROPERLY IS TO BE THE HANG MAN HANGING UPSIDE DOWN It's so upside down that a male hu...